this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
666 points (92.2% liked)

Games

31749 readers
1345 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This should be illegal, companies should be forced to open-source games (or at least provide the code to people who bought it) if they decide to discontinue it, so people can preserve it on their own.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I appreciate the sentiment around preservation, but there's an argument to be made that if you make something, you should get to decide if you want to destroy it. Banksy did something like this recently by destroying one of his pieces of art when it went up for auction.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I agree with your sentiment that a creator should have control over their work. However. I do feel that an art piece which can only exist in one form is different from commercial mass media. Mainly because you start getting in to an "original vs a copy" territory. While I believe an owner of something should have control over copyrights...once someone legally owns a "copy" of something that copy should be theirs since the owner made the mass media thing for the public to consume I believe the public should, at some point, have a say in the future trajectory of the product, after all it is still the public who "decide" if a product is good and will be remembered, and they even "decide" the value of the product as well.

Art is usually only made for a select few to own...it is "artisanal"...meanwhile video games are made for a much larger group...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The Banksy example is also bad because they didn't take anything away from anyone, just sold something that would change form after sale. And they knew that this stunt would only increase the art's value going in.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Moshi moshi, mr publisher? That book I released a year ago? Yeah, I want all copies destroyed. Yes, I mean ALL of them, including copies currently in possession of people who bought it legally.

Do you really defend that kind of right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

That's not what I'm defending at all.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Motor City Online all over again

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›