this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
11 points (100.0% liked)

CanadaPolitics

2011 readers
34 users here now

Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), on the other hand, has maintained that the oil and gas industry is not subsidized at all.

In a brief submitted last year to the parliamentary committee, CAPP argued that tax breaks it gets are part of the tax system, "therefore not subsidies."

Subsidy had better not be defined this way.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I wondered about that and found this article on the subject, which includes:

Canada's auditor general says that at its most basic level, a subsidy provides an advantage and can include tax measures such as deductions or credits, grants or direct funding (which may be earmarked for things like equipment or R&D), or government loans or loan guarantees (which are often described by the more specific term public financing).

(bolding mine)

So it seems like the CAPP is trying to sell us a false bill of goods, to me.

[–] cxtinac 3 points 2 years ago

The NDP are putting pressure on the Liberals to give this some teeth (same link as in CBC article), and because of the Supply & Services Agt. which I think specifically mentions this, have some leverage as well.

Worth encouraging Laurel Collins (NDP critic) to keep at it.

load more comments
view more: next ›