this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
30 points (96.9% liked)

Yes in my backyard!

326 readers
1 users here now

In this community, we believe in saying yes to:

Typical YIMBY policies include:

Typical housing crisis "solutions" YIMBYs are wary of:

YIMBYism transcends the typical left-right political divide; please be respectful of fellow YIMBYs with differing political views. That said, please report anyone saying anything hateful or bigoted.

Reading List

Viewing List

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let's try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Additionally, it is preferred (although not mandatory) to post a brief submission statement in the body of link posts. This is just to give a brief summary and/or description of why you think it's relevant here. Hopefully this will encourage more discussion in this community.

Recommended Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would be nice if we could set limitations on how many housing units (like individual addresses) could be owned by any one entity or corporation. Minimize that ownership, and more mixed zoning might become more feasible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't see the connection to mixed-use, honestly, and I'm a little confused about how a multi-level apartment building could be built by more than one entity, without creating another entity to manage construction.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not an expert, but aren’t you describing condos? A person owns the interior, and the outside is managed through an owners association.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I though of that, but the association (an entity) might still break OP's conditions, especially during construction when there isn't really separate interior units to speak of.

Forming an entity is the prescribed approach when you need to manage a project with a lot of stakeholders. The best next option would be some unholy web of contracts that allow a construction worker to move between units and build one on top of the other, and it's entirely possible there's some legal rule that says that can still be regarded as an entity because the courts don't want to deal with it if some legal action starts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Condos could be pre-contracted just like any other home. And I believe condo associations are resident owned.

Ultimately though, I think the important bit would be that the finished inventory is only owned by actual residents. Which a condo association would accomplish.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ultimately though, I think the important bit would be that the finished inventory is only owned by actual residents.

See, that's more practical. I still worry it would be impossible for many people to buy into their own home as opposed to renting, but it makes basic sense as a policy idea.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Rent control should be baked into all of this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Rent control as well known to be horrible for housing affordability.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Believe it when I see it.