Closing nuclear power plants is never replaced with renewables. It’s always this
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
12 points (87.5% liked)
Anime Titties
63 readers
1 users here now
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by:
hot
top
controversial
new
old
Germany build more renewables than the shutdown nuclear provided. Please don't share falsehoods.
Not really. 1/3 of your electricity production today is coal, while your nuclear dropped from 25% in the 90s to zero today. If you kept your nuclear - rather than shutting down your reactors well before the end of their life - you would be burning far less coal
you would be burning far less coal
we might be burning less coal, but how much less in percent? please qualify your statements with sources.
Also the amount of generated power is different in 1990 to today, so the percentage of nuclear would have dropped anyway.
Most European countries including Germany use less electricity now than in the 90s, so the percentage would have risen if you kept the same output of nuclear power
Nuclear peaked at 11% in the 90s and is now zero
You can see an energy mix time series on here-
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/energy-consumption-by-source-and-country?country=~DEU
Dont confuse primary energy with electricity generation. Primary includes heating and more. And Germany is producing more electricity now than in the 90s. Not as much as I thought but not less.
According to German newspapers the dismantling is to get more overburden to fill up other parts of the pit, 400 meter deep holes to generate a lake area.