this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025
441 points (97.6% liked)

Progressive Politics

2741 readers
363 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This post reads as 'You have been deemed guilty of aiding the undesirables. You will be punished."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 51 points 5 days ago (2 children)

If they're gonna go after people who mutilate children they need to start by banning circumcision.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago

Absolutely should flood the FBI with... ahem.. tips..

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, reactionary movements all built upon the premise of unequal enforcement of the rules, so best you can do is to waste their time by reporting intersex mutilations and circumcisions.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Wasting their time and resources should be our prime directive across the board

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

Spoken like a true Ron Swanson

[–] [email protected] 111 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Mutilations huh

Everyone please call the FBI to report every single circumcision you're aware of.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Mr FBI director....where is my foreskin. Give me back my foreskin.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hans Christian Graebener/Stonetoss, is that you?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Is that the far right comic guy? 😨

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yes, he got doxxed, and at point he was near suicidal about his circumcision, which would be tragic if it wasn't for him being a nazi.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

Lmfao what!? That's nuts.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 days ago (2 children)

No, that's the wrong kind of genital mutilation. Our kind of genital mutilation.is perfectly fine, we meant the other one , we hate the other one.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

we hate the other

that's it put succinctly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 134 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Finally! I Can't wait for them to make infant Circumcision illegal! That's what this is about, right? RIGHT?!

[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That was my first thought.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 6 days ago

Maybe we should start giving them tips about the removal of, well.... tips. At a massive scale, preferably.

[–] [email protected] 118 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Fun fact, 97% of gender affirming surgeries done on minors were not transgender or gender diverse (TGD) children. Only 3% of gender affirming surgeries done on minors were done on TGD children. (Study)

Of course they'll be ignoring the 97%

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This study appears to focus on breast reduction surgeries, which is considered gender-affirming care. It seems to confirm that breast reductions are overwhelmingly performed on cisgendered males regardless of age.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Probably not a high percentage, but intersex babies are routinely "altered" to conform to one gender or another with no concern to what the child may wish in the future. Sometimes without even input from the parent.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm actually fine with them stopping that one. Leave it to the kid to decide.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I believe the 97/3% is specifically looking at breast reduction surgery. This means 97% were not trans or gender diverse children but they had the surgery. This is something no one would bat an eye at if you were a cis man with man boobs and wanted to look more masculine, but if someone who is trans or gender diverse has the same procedure then it's suddenly a huge deal.

It's a double standard

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Of gender-affirming surgical procedures identified among adults and minors, 1591 of 2664 (59.7%) and 82 of 85 (96.4%) were chest-related procedures, respectively. Of the 636 breast reductions among cisgender male and TGD adults, 507 (80%) were performed on cisgender males. Of the 151 breast reductions among cisgender male minors and TGD minors, 146 (97%) were performed on cisgender male minors (Figure 2).

It doesn't seem to break it down quite how I'd like, but the 97% and matching 3% are specifically about breast reductions.

The things I don't understand are the 85 and 151. What are the differences between those numbers? They both seem to refer to total procedures on minors.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)

How about the people cutting pieces of infants genitals? I wonder when that count as mutilations.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago

No, that's ok because the crazy cult leader in my town said so.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I bet they're still pushing for boys to be circumcised though

Revolting.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 days ago

They said to report tips. You should report those missing tips.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Which magically doesn't include surgeries on intersex children, because it's the appropriate kind of mutilation under the guise of gender-affirming care.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

It helps that voyager puts a baby emoji next to your account name.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 days ago

FBI and CIA are behind a lot of the human trafficking, so word-salad, word-salad, "protect."

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It will only get worse for us ☺️

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I would say come over to the UK, but it's the next worse place in the democratic world.

Might be worth leaving for Canada, as I've heard many have done. Not sure if that's in any way realistic at all for you though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 days ago

Without fail the ones that scream 'for the children' are about 99% the ones abusing them.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 days ago

Abolish the FBI

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They want to protect children by destroying the children that are different.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 days ago

Conforming to the "norm" is the highest good in conservative ethics; it's a way of signaling allegiance to the in-group.

Their most dripping disdain is reserved for people who refuse to live in the little box that was assigned to them; this is the social contract as conservatives see it.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Is this actually real? What the fuck USA, what did all these Trump voting morons get us into...

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Global depression followed by world war while half the planet dies and the climate is ignored.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

now now, russia is getting single-handedly held up by ukraine, china seems to be quite happy not being blithering morons and watching everyone else stab themselves in the gut, and america is incompetent, so it'll just be a global depression with half the planet dying and the climate being ignored 🥰

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThePantser 19 points 6 days ago (2 children)

But circumcision is still very much allowed and is a form of gender affirming care.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There is no way that circumcision can be considered gender-affirming care.

[–] ThePantser 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Some say it makes the penis look better so it's a stretch. But it is just as much genital mutilation as the anti trans people claim some other care causes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago

That's not gender-affirming care

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Become a government informant. Report your friends and family. Fabulous prizes to be won!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Gross. FBI don't you have something better to do?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Says the government that uses child porn in sting operations.

[–] bitwolf 2 points 5 days ago

Report pickup truck drivers lol

load more comments
view more: next ›