Fediverse

287 readers

1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the federated social networking ecosystem, which includes decentralized and open-source social media platforms. Whether you are a user, developer, or simply interested in the concept of decentralized social media, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as the benefits and challenges of decentralized social media, new and existing federated platforms, and more. From the latest developments and trends to ethical considerations and the future of federated social media, this category covers a wide range of topics related to the Fediverse.

founded 1 year ago

Project92 and the Fediverse - A Smarter Battle Plan to Protect the Open Social Web (www.timothychambers.net)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

With the upcoming #meta #Project92 Fediverse service, this is a plan to fight smarter in how to both protect our users, and how to be better battle plan to protect the Open Social Web.

top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure why people are making this such a big deal? I don't quite understand why some server admins are planning to instantly defederate it. Maybe someone here could help me understand. Anything you post publicly is, by definition, public. There's concerns about moderation, but Meta has paid moderators and experience in catching spam.

I agree with John Gruber's take on this:
https://daringfireball.net/linked/2023/06/19/not-that-kind-of-open
https://daringfireball.net/linked/2023/06/21/fosstodon

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I prefer Sean Tilley's take: John Gruber Doesn’t Know What He’s Talking About

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I agree with arguments about Meta's moderation (more accurately, lack of it) and rebuffing the idea that using open protocols means we're obliged to connect with everybody. Also, Gruber's assertion of pettiness is ridiculous; Meta is a heinous company who doesn't deserve any benefit of the doubt.

But I think ppl on the fediverse need to get real about data privacy. Meta has a ton of data and I'm not sure how much extra value fediverse data would be to it, but if they want fediverse data they can already get it. The fediverse is public and crawling it is way easier than building a compatible AP service and hoping non-meta users connect to your users. They can get all public data on the fediverse with a webcrawl, but building a service means spending time and money and they still would only get data from users willing to connect with their service.
TLDR: Blocking a Meta AP service does not protect your data from Meta.