Technology

59735 readers

2710 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

769

OpenAI now tries to hide that ChatGPT was trained on copyrighted books, including J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter series (www.businessinsider.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

300 comments fedilink hide all child comments

OpenAI now tries to hide that ChatGPT was trained on copyrighted books, including J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter series::A new research paper laid out ways in which AI developers should try and avoid showing LLMs have been trained on copyrighted material.

(page 7) 33 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It feels like we've just taken our first steps down the path of the Robin Williams acted movie 'Bicentennial Man' timeline.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

Our ancient legal system trying to lend itself to "protecting authors" is fucking absurd. AI is the future. Are we really going to let everyone take a shot suing these guys over this crap? Its a useful program and infrastructure for everyone.

Holding technology back for antiquated copyright law is downright absurd.

Edit: I want to add that I'm not suggesting copyright should be a free for all on your books or hard work, but rather that this is a computer program and a major breakthrough, and in the same way that if I read a book no one sues my brain for consumption I don't think we should sue an AI: it is not reproducing books. In the same manner that many footnotes websites about books do not reproduce a book by summarizing their content. With the contingency that until Open AI does not have an event where their reputation has to be re-evaluated (IE this is subject to change if they start trying to reproduce books).

load more comments (10 replies)

[–] Lucidlethargy -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lol, oh my gosh guys, it's true. This is a (error ridden) line from dobby.

Edit: I'm sorry, but I can't stop laughing. This is amazing. I can't stop... I won't stop.

load more comments