this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
147 points (88.5% liked)

World News

33423 readers
523 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There is already a serious problem in modern discourse with the term "independent media," a phrase commonly defined as any media outlet, no matter how big an empire it is, that is not owned or funded by the state (as if that is the only form of dependence or control to which media is subject). But even at this extremely low bar, all these outlets fail. Indeed, Weimers' warning underlines the fact that none of them are independent in any meaningful way. They are, in fact, completely dependent on USAID for their very existence.

Not only that, but some USAID-backed journalists candidly admit that their funding dictates their output and what stories they do and do not cover. Leila Bicakcic, CEO of Center for Investigative Reporting (a USAID-supported Bosnian organization), admitted, on camera, that "If you are funded by the U.S. government, there are certain topics that you would simply not go after, because the U.S. government has its interests that are above all others."

While USAID specifically targets foreign audiences, much of its messaging comes back to America, as those foreign outlets are used as credible, independent, and reliable sources for newspapers or cable news networks to cite. Thus, its bankrolling of foreign media ends up flooding domestic audiences with pro-U.S. messaging as well.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

American soft power has been crippled worldwide. You really have to ask yourself when the moderators of Wikipedia are going to go ahead and edit the Cold War page.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

People have been joking about fake as hell NGOs being used for espionage and misinformation for decades, but its weird they they're actually throwing away their leverage across the board.

Unless they plan to just move the funding to another organization like the CIA.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i love mintpressnews. their links were and probably still are banned on facebook and instagram and probably more places. the great firewall of the US is too good

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Their links are banned on .world as well.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

.stormfront Putting the Fed in fediverse as always.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

the only media i care about is people or outlets supported by small donations from regular people & lots of transparency about their sources. if otherwise, they can go fuck off

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"any media outlet, no matter how big an empire it is, that is not owned or funded by the state" is not the common definition of "independent media" (it's not even the definition given in the hyperlinked definition). "Independence" in this context refers to journalistic independence.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This was an incredible read. All the liberal media lamenting the loss of USAID, but an estimated 90% of the funds were actually used to further CIA goals. Crazy. 10/10 would read again.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

now read their articles on tiktok, twitter, facebook, etc

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Though I’m sure some of them will find new funding through whatever new channels the Trump administration builds.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Hilarious photo!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (23 children)

I wonder if they're really that stupid to give up this super-efficient means of soft power over some progressive things they've done or intentionally handing influence in parts of the world to Russia for a bit of money for themselves while taking a calculated risk of maybe having to retake control militarily (which is more costly but could be a problem for the next admin).

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If USAID appears as horrific to the general public, and not really news for many people with a critical mind, just imagine what its proposed replacement will be like under Trump.

Not too many administrations ago a USAF intelligence organization was formed directly under presidential supervision as chief, and came into contradiction with NSA/CIA. Then there was HSA which had a green light by past administrations to violate the constitution at will and simply blanket any enemy as a national security matter.

Of all those corporate/state tools against humanity and rights, USAID has outlived its purpose. But don't get too happy, they are just burying it in a good moment to start clean, without historic responsibilities carried on.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

At least the whole world knows that trump is a raving lunatic, incapable of honesty, empathy and integrity. Invoking his name to justify sleazy propaganda perpetrated by others doesn't wash

load more comments
view more: next ›