For that price, does it compress anything you put in the bag?
this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
621 points (99.4% liked)
PC Master Race
15561 readers
3 users here now
A community for PC Master Race.
Rules:
- No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No NSFW content.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘stupid’ questions. The world won’t be made better or worse by snarky comments schooling naive newcomers on Lemmy.
Notes:
- PCMR Community Name - Our Response and the Survey
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah that’s called a bag of holding and it would be worth 1000x that. Hell I’d probably save up all my Pennie’s for that.
Hella respect for this move, and i like the look of these. I just wish it had come at a time before I was concerned about the price of everything that I need to survive sky rocketing. Would have purchased 2 years ago.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Libre software selling whatever they can is good for maintaining development.
If the Linux kernel ever changed to AGPLv3 I would for sure buy one GNU/Linux stable release each year to make up for corporations that would ban Linux from their network due to AGPL3 legal obligations.
corporations that would ban Linux from their network
You can't change the license retroactively. Corporations would likely hard-fork the kernel at the last GPL2 commit and move it to a restricted but compliant access model like Red Hat did.
You can change the license moving forward though it takes a tremendous amount of effort.
Only rich companies have dedicated full time kernel developers. The vast majority literally take full advantage of the fact that the kernel is free (gratis). And any changes they make to the GPL2 kernel is still subject to open source disclosure.
I believe Torvalds has publicly stated that he wouldn't support a move to GPL3, let alone AGPL.
Prob those companies will go back to windows server or freebsd lol.
For the sake of basic security, there should be a lot more corporate adoption of OpenBSD and FreeBSD. Company networks would be a lot more secure than using Linux due to Linux's schizophrenic nature. Ask a full time BSD sysadmin their view on Linux.
Honest question: to what are you referring by "Linux’s schizophrenic nature"?
load more comments
(1 replies)
True, additionally windows server doesn't give them flexibility.
load more comments
(1 replies)
TIL they have a Linux version of WinRAR
Missed opportunity to call it LinRar
load more comments
(1 replies)
I'm troubled by that literal brick of leaf cards
This actually looks like a really nice bag though lol I might actually buy this if it were a bit cheaper
load more comments
(1 replies)
I bought it decades ago, but lost my product key. 😞
Oh it's not a joke.
My reaction to this whole year tbh
The answer to that question: "by never buying a WinRAR bag?"