184
I had always understood that any talks of annexing a sovereign country was a HUGE no-no... akin to spanking your boss' wife after being introduced... yet here we are and absolutely nobody seems to be doing anything about it
this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
184 points (98.4% liked)
Canada
7614 readers
585 users here now
What's going on Canada?
Related Communities
🍁 Meta
🗺️ Provinces / Territories
- Alberta
- British Columbia
- Manitoba
- New Brunswick
- Newfoundland and Labrador
- Northwest Territories
- Nova Scotia
- Nunavut
- Ontario
- Prince Edward Island
- Quebec
- Saskatchewan
- Yukon
🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
- Calgary (AB)
- Edmonton (AB)
- Greater Sudbury (ON)
- Guelph (ON)
- Halifax (NS)
- Hamilton (ON)
- Kootenays (BC)
- London (ON)
- Mississauga (ON)
- Montreal (QC)
- Nanaimo (BC)
- Oceanside (BC)
- Ottawa (ON)
- Port Alberni (BC)
- Regina (SK)
- Saskatoon (SK)
- Thunder Bay (ON)
- Toronto (ON)
- Vancouver (BC)
- Vancouver Island (BC)
- Victoria (BC)
- Waterloo (ON)
- Winnipeg (MB)
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
🏒 Sports
Hockey
- Main: c/Hockey
- Calgary Flames
- Edmonton Oilers
- Montréal Canadiens
- Ottawa Senators
- Toronto Maple Leafs
- Vancouver Canucks
- Winnipeg Jets
Football (NFL): incomplete
Football (CFL): incomplete
Baseball
Basketball
Soccer
- Main: /c/CanadaSoccer
- Toronto FC
💻 Schools / Universities
- BC | UBC (U of British Columbia)
- BC | SFU (Simon Fraser U)
- BC | VIU (Vancouver Island U)
- BC | TWU (Trinity Western U)
- ON | UofT (U of Toronto)
- ON | UWO (U of Western Ontario)
- ON | UWaterloo (U of Waterloo)
- ON | UofG (U of Guelph)
- ON | OTU (Ontario Tech U)
- QC | McGill (McGill U)
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales
- Personal Finance Canada
- BAPCSalesCanada
- Canadian Investor
- Buy Canadian
- Quebec Finance
- Churning Canada
🗣️ Politics
- General:
- Federal Parties (alphabetical):
- By Province (alphabetical):
🍁 Social / Culture
Rules
- Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Considering Trump said he would begin the attack by hurting us economically and then enacted tariffs, paused for only a month, and then added more tariffs that ARE in effect, we should be considering this as already started.
It’s literally happening right now and people need to stop acting like it’s not.
Delaying tariffs is worse than having them.
Canadians can’t price orders to US companies or price any cross border deliveries.
Tariffs are functionally in effect as long as the axe swings over our head like this.
For incoming products, sure, but I don't see how that applies to outgoing products? If we sell something to the US, and it gets a tariff applied after the sale but before delivery, it's the receiver that has to pay the tariff, so the only risk is for multiple delivery contracts being cancelled.
We have no problems with pricing since any tariffs we put on will have advance warning unlike that buffoon that comes up with an idea and signs it in place within two days.
If I were in charge I'd be nailing him to the wall with 50% tariffs on EVERYTHING we ship to America. His supporters would be screaming at $8-10 per gallon of gas.
Hit him hard and force him to step back 'cause this pussy-footing around isn't doing any good.
100%. The US does not have the domestic manufacturing capability to be swinging their stick like this and the tariffs don’t affect(directly) trade with the countries willing to play nice.
Decrease potash exports by 5% every week tariffs are in place. We’d have them where we want them within 6 weeks.
I would say enacting immediate 100% cut offs to the food supply make us out to be the bad guys. But with a consistent measured response we would get results without making an enemy of most everyday American people.
What Canuck ever listens to the Russian Amabassador? ( do we even have one?). And now we have two!!
We don't, but the White House does it seems. Since President Musk repeats anything the Russians say, and even his minister of intelligence is a known Russian spy apparently.
Cut the US off from our electricity grid? I know we’d lose money, which would suck.
This issue is that Trump is an unhinged lunatic now in charge of arguably the most powerful military in the world. We would need to be careful how we push back so he doesn't have an excuse to start an actual war. I once thought that no US President would be dumb enough to pull that trigger, but I am starting to have my doubts.
We would need to be careful how we push back so he doesn’t have an excuse to start an actual war.
I don't think a single unhinged lunatic in all of human history ever suddenly became reasonable because their victims began walking on eggshells. In fact, the opposite happens. Just ask his buddy, Putin.
Trump will do what he wants, no matter what our response is. So, we can tell the world that we will not cave to this madman, and hope that our allies back us up.
Either way, we lose hard by not doing anything or being too light in our response.
And yes, a war is possible - no matter what we do - that's the unfortunate reality of having a lunatic in charge. We have the support of NATO if it comes to that. Trump will need to decide whether he wants to be dragged around town like Mussolini, or not.
We have the support of NATO if it comes to that.
Sadly it's unlikely you'd get any military support. The ranges involved prohibit anything but an armada of aircraft carriers from doing anything significant in a north-american theater of war. So the few NATO aircraft carriers that aren't US owned (UK 2, Italy 2, France 1 (3 helicopter carriers)) won't be able to help you guys out. They (and any troop transports) would be destroyed before they come anywhere close to the US.
It would take many decades for the European half of NATO to develop a military strong enough to take on the US on your side of the atlantic. At that point Canada might be so integrated into the US that the people who'd like us to come help you won't be enough for us to actually risk it.
The only thing we Europeans could realistically do is completely sanction the US. This of course would likely be the excuse the US eventually uses to lash out physically, which could lead to a world war (possibly the last world war). Europe's safest move is to just wait it out until the US snaps out of the insanity, or gets more unhinged and starts attacking itself (civil war. Hopefully a non-nuclear one). Then when the US lies in ruins (or the right people win quickly), Canada might be a country again.
All that said, I think an invasion is very unlikely at the moment. If the order to invade Canada went out tomorrow, much of the military would most likely revolt and depose the government. Of course this might change over time as more loyal generals are installed.
The current administration is filled with morons, but I think even they are smart enough to realize they are not yet in a position to do anything but be economically annoying. So if Trump goes full retard and says he's going to order an invasion, the people around him will stuff him away in an old folks home and let JD take over.
If the order to invade Canada went out tomorrow, much of the military would most likely revolt and depose the government.
Honestly, this would be the stuff of heros.
And if they don't outright revolt, then they'll forever be known as the army that supported another Nazi leadership. They would be a stain on human history for all time.
There's gonna be pain no matter what we do. We're better off just gritting our teeth and ripping the bandage off instead of waiting for him to do it for us.
Going on the offensive has far better chances than sticking with this defensive pattern we're in now.