this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
120 points (98.4% liked)

Keep Track

693 readers
161 users here now

Keeping Track of the 2nd Trump administration!

One thing Donald Trump and the extreme right were very good at doing is burying the track record of his first presidency from 2017 to 2021.

Keep Track is dedicated to literally keeping track, day by day, of the policy decisions made by the new Trump Administration.

That is not to say we're interested in the crazy things he says or tweets, he clocked over 30,000 lies the last time he was in office, I don't see how it's possible to track all of that. This is about POLICY. Nominees, executive orders, signed laws, and so on.

Subject line format should be {{date}} {{event}} so: "01-20-2025 - Trump is sworn in."

The international date format of 2025-01-20 is also acceptable!

Links should be to verifiable news sources, not social media or blog sites. So no Xitter/Truth/Youtube/Substack/etc. etc.

founded 3 weeks ago
MODERATORS
 

This is from a new york times gift article from the nyt.

TikTok ban

What the administration did

  • Ordered the Justice Department not to enforce a ban on TikTok for 75 days and to notify the app and its business partners that defying the law is no criminal offense.

What it could be violating

  • Law barring TikTok from operating in the United States unless and until its Chinese owner sells it.

Foreign aid freeze

What the administration did

  • Required blanket temporary freeze on most foreign aid.

What it could be violating

  • The longer it lasts, blocking congressionally approved spending comes into greater tension with Impoundment Control Act.

Domestic grants freeze

What the administration did

  • The Office of Management and Budget ordered agencies to carry out a blanket temporary freeze up to $3 trillion in domestic grants and other government spending.

What it could be violating

  • The freeze has been temporarily blocked by two courts after plaintiffs raised challenges, including provisions in the Administrative Procedure Act and First Amendment rights.

U.S. Agency for International Development

What the administration did

  • Moved to apparently dismantle the agency and fold its functions into the State Department, including by making Secretary of State Marco Rubio its acting director.

What it could be violating

  • A law in which Congress created U.S.A.I.D. and structured it as a stand-alone entity.

Inspectors general

What the administration did

  • Summarily fired 17 inspectors general, the watchdog officials who hunt for waste, fraud, abuse and illegality in government agencies.

What it could be violating

  • A law that says presidents have to give Congress 30 days’ notice and a written “substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons” before any such removal.

National Labor Relations Board

What the administration did

  • Summarily fired a Democratic member of the independent agency before her term was up, paralyzing the board by leaving it without a quorum.

What it could be violating

  • A law that says presidents may only remove board members “upon notice and hearing, for neglect of duty or malfeasance in office, but for no other cause.”

Federal prosecutors

What the administration did

  • Summarily fired prosecutors involved in the cases against President Trump or the Jan. 6 rioters.

What it could be violating

  • Civil service job protections against arbitrarily firing federal workers without a good cause and without hearings before the Merit System Protection Board.

Birthright citizenship

What the administration did

  • Declared that the Constitution’s 14th Amendment will no longer be interpreted as granting citizenship to babies born on U.S. soil to undocumented parents or other visitors and instructed agencies not to issue citizenship-affirming documents, like Social Security cards, to such infants.

What it could be violating

  • The longstanding understanding that the 14th Amendment does grant citizenship to such infants; a federal judge has barred agencies from obeying this order for now.
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor 16 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Wouldn't it be faster if you tracked which of them don't break the law?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

yeah it is a bit like keeping track of when trump is lying.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There is an easy trick to know - he opens his mouth.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

He lies on a screen at least as much as he does in person.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Are they even laws if nobody applies them?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

I mean, if nobody will impeach, and nobody can arrest him, are they really crimes at all ....... until someone can? *edit: and now that the supreme court has ruled that any action taken while president cannot be criminally prosecuted even after that president leaves office, then I'm not sure the President CAN commit a crime any longer, the word loses all meaning without the mechanism to enforce the law

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago

Here's all the unaddressed shit from round 1: https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/the-complete-listing-atrocities-1-1-056

Organise offline, folks. The institutions are dead. Build your community. Much love in the days ahead.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

No longer applicablePlease don't use markdown code blocks for things that aren't code. The formatting looks horrible and requires extensive scrolling to read anything. Indenting lines with 4 or more spaces is what causes code block formatting.

Consider using bullets or something if you want to mark those paragraphs differently. Headings might also help for the section.

I posted a version that's much more readable. I used second level headings because first level ones are much too large. Bold text might have been sufficient.

Screenshot:

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

oh my apologies I was not trying to use markdown text and the effect did not show as I was typing. I did not realize.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You can view the source of my comment with the fixed formatting and then copy it into your post body if you'd like.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I actually do not see any option to view the source of your comment. I am on mbin so im not sure if that makes a difference on options.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

OK, I'll stick it all in a code block which suppresses the markdown and shows you the special characters. You can just copy and paste it all. 😁

Source

This is from a new york times gift article from the nyt.

## TikTok ban
        
What the administration did

* Ordered the Justice Department not to enforce a ban on TikTok for 75 days and to notify the app and its business partners that defying the law is no criminal offense.
        
What it could be violating

* Law barring TikTok from operating in the United States unless and until its Chinese owner sells it.

## Foreign aid freeze
        
What the administration did

* Required blanket temporary freeze on most foreign aid.
        
What it could be violating

* The longer it lasts, blocking congressionally approved spending comes into greater tension with Impoundment Control Act.

## Domestic grants freeze
        
What the administration did

* The Office of Management and Budget ordered agencies to carry out a blanket temporary freeze up to $3 trillion in domestic grants and other government spending.
        
What it could be violating

* The freeze has been temporarily blocked by two courts after plaintiffs raised challenges, including provisions in the Administrative Procedure Act and First Amendment rights.

## U.S. Agency for International Development
        
What the administration did

* Moved to apparently dismantle the agency and fold its functions into the State Department, including by making Secretary of State Marco Rubio its acting director.
        
What it could be violating

* A law in which Congress created U.S.A.I.D. and structured it as a stand-alone entity.
    
## Inspectors general
        
What the administration did

* Summarily fired 17 inspectors general, the watchdog officials who hunt for waste, fraud, abuse and illegality in government agencies.
        
What it could be violating

* A law that says presidents have to give Congress 30 days’ notice and a written “substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons” before any such removal.

## National Labor Relations Board
        
What the administration did

* Summarily fired a Democratic member of the independent agency before her term was up, paralyzing the board by leaving it without a quorum.
        
What it could be violating

* A law that says presidents may only remove board members “upon notice and hearing, for neglect of duty or malfeasance in office, but for no other cause.”

## Federal prosecutors
        
What the administration did

* Summarily fired prosecutors involved in the cases against President Trump or the Jan. 6 rioters.
        
What it could be violating

* Civil service job protections against arbitrarily firing federal workers without a good cause and without hearings before the Merit System Protection Board.

## Birthright citizenship
        
What the administration did

* Declared that the Constitution’s 14th Amendment will no longer be interpreted as granting citizenship to babies born on U.S. soil to undocumented parents or other visitors and instructed agencies not to issue citizenship-affirming documents, like Social Security cards, to such infants.
        
What it could be violating

* The longstanding understanding that the 14th Amendment does grant citizenship to such infants; a federal judge has barred agencies from obeying this order for now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think it worked. Would love if you could confirm.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

ok gonna give it a shot.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

How many centuries will it take the courts to sort all this out?

Or is it millenniums? :)