this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
687 points (93.9% liked)

politics

19675 readers
3413 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"If the purges [of potential voters], challenges and ballot rejections were random, it wouldn’t matter. It’s anything but random. For example, an audit by the State of Washington found that a Black voter was 400% more likely than a white voter to have their mail-in ballot rejected. Rejection of Black in-person votes, according to a US Civil Rights Commission study in Florida, ran 14.3% or one in seven ballots cast."

"[...] Democracy can win* despite the 2.3% suppression headwind.

And that’s our job as Americans: to end the purges, the vigilante challenges, the ballot rejections and the attitude that this is all somehow OK."

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Once again, Trump said (during his first term, I believe) on Fox News Republicans would never win another election if minorities vote. They know this. They consistently make it harder and harder for people to vote, while targeting minorities.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We all know. Nothing was or will be done. Now they can rig it from the inside. Was a fun run!

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Democrats had the opportunity to fix this when they were in office. They chose to protect the filibuster instead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dem pols are always too afraid to exercise the power they have when they win. Always. When Biden won, DC and Puerto Rican statehood should have been the first things on the agenda.

The GOP is never afraid to exercise as much power as they can get away with.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Biden never had enough control of the whole government to get those things done without Republican buy-in.

A Republican controlled house won't send a bill like that to the Senate. A Republican controlled Senate won't send it to the President.

You can be upset at Biden, but we've rarely ever given a Democratic president a Democratic Congress to help him get anything done.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Uh, no. He had a Democratic congress the first half of his term. Part of why he lost them is Dems are so tepid with exercising the power the voters give them.

Nothing the Dems do, or even try to do, gin the base up into excitement. The base never feels inspired that the Dems are striving for the goals they claim to represent and want.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (6 children)

This is why Kamala accepting the outcome "No matter what", to prove she's better than Trump...

Was the dumbest thing she could have done because it was just playing into the GOP's hand.

The Republican game is "You go high, we go low, because low gets us elected and furthers our agenda."

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

That's some thorough analysis, holy cow...

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

While voter suppression exists, voter suppression didn't make safe blue states go down 2 digits of percentage.

Its the propaganda that did it. Money won. Unlimited money to throw at the propaganda manifacturing, won (thanks to citizens united)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Oh please. We had the same shit in 2020 and we had a record turn out.

Don't put the blame on voter suppression when it's American stupidity and apathy that's the cause.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

It is in the end stupidly and apathy. But, you can't deny that voter suppression is also a big thing and it should be addressed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (15 children)

Re post text: For context, Washington state is mail-only voting, so that number would (I assume) be for all votes, not just specifically requested mail-ins. I didn't see it in the article, but I wonder if that is predominantly "centralized" or "distributed" in nature; i.e. are technically-valid ballots from all voters being incorrectly rejected by the county elections facilities office at different rates across racial lines, or are there other factors like targeted disinformation, education, local infrastructure, or socioeconomics that disproportionately affect Black (or other types of minority) voters that would make them more likely to produce a technically-invalid ballot?

Those might get the same statistic, but would seem to indicate very different sorts of problems and approaches.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›