Monero

No, thank you. The only communication with exchanges should be 'please delist us, we have haveno now (and serai soon)'.

Besides that, every single one of us is capable of telling people about the use-case and advantages of monero (and potentially help others to start using it).

So yeah, I like my monero without an official head, that would be chopped off anyway.

Github issues or tissues IMHO

It does. The proof of status comes from your value to the community and that can change with time.

Look at Michael Saylor, for instance. He's undeniably an official Bitcoin representative, yet he's undeniably been incredibly harmful to the Bitcoin ethos, moving it from digital cash, to digital energy, to digital gold (HODL only), to now digital property (i.e. government controlled trad-fi) that should be managed custodially and is subject to a "digital property tax" (i.e. wealth tax). Through Saylor and his ilk, other Bitcoin destroyers have been promoted as Bitcoin representatives and actual OGs have been sidelined.

Meanwhile, Luke Parker (now retiring for a bit), Doug Thurman, Arctic Mine, etc are undeniably Monero representatives because they proved their value, but when some of these representatives try to promote the Zano leads as being kindred spirits with Monero and potentially the way forward for Monero, a large portion of the Monero community balked because whatever past contributes they may or may not have had, they don't represent Monero now and promotes some very un-Monero ideals. This healthy direct contribution=representation ideal keeps Monero on track and on mission.

How about fluffypony 2.0?

I don't think it's needed, it's better focus on development

Fluffypony used to be unofficial Chief Entertainment Officer which helped get the word out. Perhaps the community would benefit from more extrovert & knowledgeable public faces, but we don't need any official status/role for that.