this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
443 points (93.0% liked)

memes

10629 readers
1860 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 14 hours ago

This is a story that's been rotating through the media since ChatGPT first released.

I have an unpopular opinion about this headline after seeing the media cycle repeatedly downplay/ignore what Alphabet has been doing in response to OpenAI: Google the search engine is not in direct competition with ChatGPT, but Gemini is, and Alphabet is smart to keep simpler/time-tested search functionality central to Google rather than react strongly and scrap the keyword-based search bar that users understand are comfortable using - especially older users, but I think most people are starting to discover they have a use for both search and LLM chats.

I think there are two product categories here, which first looked like they were going to converge in 2022-2024, but which are now slowly changing course as customers start to comprehend how both are necessary for different purposes.

When I make chats in ChatGPT or Gemini or Claude etc, I am starting to plan them longitudinally so that I can use them over and over for a specific project or query type.

When I turn to a search bar, it's because I really want a proxy for a specific website or between me and whatever weird site has the answer to my specific question. It's not that I want discussion and a chat about it, I just want Google's card-like results with a website index I can read instead of that website's stylized, animated web design on top or popups or malware.

Every time I get sucked into a chat with Bing CoPilot(ChatGPT) when I really only had a web search query, I regret wasting my time talking to the LLM. Almost as a reflex, I've started avoiding it for most things now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

Chat~gpt~ is this real

[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago

Just duck it bro. (Add !chat to your query or use ai assistant in results)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago

Just check your tea leaves.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Might as well. All the sites are just AI articles anyway

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

Just ask Elon

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

Google isn’t a search engine any more. It stopped being that some years ago.

Now it’s more accurately described as a shitty content feed that can be weakly filtered using key words.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago

@RmDebArc_5 I'm all about "DuckDuckGo this !" 🦆

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

“Will you go out with me?”

[–] [email protected] 0 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Is it weird I use ms copilot on a regular?

Solely because it will cite its source on answers so I don't have to sift through pages of results.

[–] RmDebArc_5 2 points 12 hours ago

I mean I get wanting this feature, but there is a dosen alternatives that more privacy respecting (Brave, Perplexity etc)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 12 hours ago

I use copilot expressly because I want my direct exposure to Ansible (such trash) to be as little as possible so as not to pollute my experience and unlearn programming, so I query, copy, validate and paste. Let its mind turn to jello, and spare mine!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›