this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
295 points (90.4% liked)

Lord Of The Rings Memes

189 readers
667 users here now

founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Cruelly overlooked: getting Tremors 1, 2, 3 and Highlander 1, 2, 3 onto this chart.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago

Alien, but it shares a graph with some others

[–] [email protected] 35 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Back to the Future 3 is nowhere near on par with 2.

This is some ragebait right here

[–] [email protected] 23 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Wtf do you mean, part 3 is awesome and has some of the best humor in the series. Sure it's a bit derivative, but that doesn't stop it from being a better 3rd in a trilogy than most others. It's also got a lot of quotable moments, I quote this for just about anything that's hot

Well, I suppose if you had a straight stretch of track with a level grade, and you weren't haulin' no cars behind you, and if you can get the fire hot enough, and I'm talkin' about hotter than the blazes of hell and damnation itself... then yes

[–] [email protected] 11 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

1 and 2 are about even. 3 is a little lower than them, but not by much.

The first two really are parts 1 and 2 of a story. The 3rd completely changes the scenery, which gives some people the impression it's not as good. It is though , and it ends the story well.

Then there's the fun fact that parts 2 and 3 were filmed at the same time. So the impression the films give is backwards from how they were made.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I'm considering it better. Not that part 2 is bad, but I like part 3 more.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago

I think he stole that guy's wallet

[–] [email protected] 10 points 17 hours ago

I can't wait for Dune 3. If Villeneuve sticks the landing his trilogy will become for Sci-fi what LotR is for fantasy.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 20 hours ago

The bars for the LOTR trilogy are only that scale because of how long the movies are.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

LOTR is the same as star wars. First one is 95%, second is 100%, third is 80%. Way too much climbing and whining in the third one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

I'd say the highs more than make up for the climb

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 17 hours ago

Kinda telling how many of these are Spielberg, movie making beast

[–] [email protected] 10 points 19 hours ago

This is bait.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Since no one here is talking about the Jurassic Park trilogy, I'll go ahead and say my hot take. JP3 is way better than 2. And obviously the originals are all miles ahead of the Jurassic Worlds.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 14 hours ago

I just watched the first one again and it's still a pretty good movie.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of those crappy trilogies were not written all at once the way LOTR was. The more common case of writing follow-ups to cash in on the popularity of the original is a time-honoured way to make money while producing derivative garbage.

I feel like we need a different word to separate those “cash grab” trilogies from proper multi-part stories like LOTR.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

That's a good point. I'm endlessly fascinated the Back to the Future was not a planned trilogy. I always assumed it was well into adulthood.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Blade is definitely better than Blade 2 IMO.

I might pick Die Hard 3 over 2 as well, but it's been a bit since I saw 2.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago

Came here to say this about Die Hard. I thought 3 was waaay better than 2.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 20 hours ago

Die Hard 3 is commonly thought of as one of the good ones. The other one is DH1.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 21 hours ago

DH2 isn’t very memorable outside of ~2 key moments.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

I must protest this mistreatment of spiderman 3

[–] [email protected] 9 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago

1! = 1

I'm disappointed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago

Whoa whoa whoa mad max 1 is the best of the three. Sure, the sequels have crazier worldbuilding and fancier visuals but the first is tight, well shot, and tells a good story well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I totally forgot Blade is a trilogy

[–] [email protected] 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Blade 3 is... not good.

That's the one where Wesley Snipes was throwing a bit of a tantrum and refused to open his eyes for a scene, so they had to use CGI.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Haha okay I'm glad I didn't miss anything good. I only ever watched the first one, but this post made me curious.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

I love all three Godfather movies.

The Godfather, The Godfather II Part 1, and The Godfather II Part 2

That other one doesn’t exist as far as I’m concerned.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

I’m not going to argue that GF3 is anywhere close to GF1 and GF2, but I am going to argue that GF3 gets way too much hate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago

Is this counting films in trilogies, or the trilogies themselves?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago

Interesting choice not to include the Hobbit movies! I'd probably go 1>2>3, but all those bars would be appropriately hobbit-sized (sans ent-draught).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

This is refreshingly accurate

[–] [email protected] 6 points 21 hours ago

Personally I enjoyed matrix 3 more than 2.

The Star Wars one could also apply to the sequels, keep the proportion but maybe lower by half? Ep. 8 certainly was the least bad.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago

Mad max is wrong. While sequels...they are not even in the same space. The first one is good for its simplicity.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›