this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
205 points (97.7% liked)

PC Gaming

8873 readers
1316 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

As a result, some consumers resorted to purchasing TPM modules for their existing hardware, while others turned to customized Windows 11 ISOs that bypassed the TPM requirement entirely.

Who is doing this?!? If you are a business user, your company should pay for a new PC. If you are a gamer, you have a year to upgrade your MB. Everyone else has a year to figure out if Linux is right for them. At this point, Linux can perfectly cover most non-business users or those who are not multiplayer online gamers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I play Xonotic btw. You can play minecraft and terraria on Linux too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

I got the notice to update to 11 a long time ago, then months later a notice my work laptop did not comply with requirements of TPM, but CPU OK.

For my HP workstation it had TPM 1.x and there was a firmware update that brought chip up to TPM 2.0. After I did that the W11 then said CPU doesn't pass.

Then recently CPU is fine. LOL

They don't even know what they want.

For home stuff everything is moved to Linux.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›