this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
1094 points (97.2% liked)

memes

10637 readers
3045 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago


"We"? Who's "we"? There is no "we".

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And yet they show us ads even if we do pay.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Well yes, that's how they don't go out of business. In theory.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So you're saying the audience for the ads have the people who are willing to pay for stuff, the very people the advertisers are paying to reach, removed from it.

I wonder how much longer this will go before the advertisers catch on to that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (9 children)

You forgot the part where they pay the video creator 50% of the money and use the other 50% to run one of the most computationally expensive and complex services on the internet.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't know about computationaly expensive. Once video is processed, it's mostly just a fancy CDN.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Wouldn't serving video and bandwidth concerns count as complexity?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I was sort of lumping storage and compute costs together as "compute" but compute itself is probably astronomical too.

Even if it was just a CDN, a cdn at that scale streaming that much content simultaneously would require a huge amount of compute just to handle the streaming request traffic.

There's also the recommendation algorithm which is powered by ai and takes a shit ton of parameters, at that scale that would be a massive computational task in and of itself.

Even video processing they probably send it through a couple Ai pipelines to add subtitles, make sure it's not porn, check if your discussing topics with high misinformation so it can put that Wikipedia link below the video, etc.

All that plus probably another million other little problems that comes with running a service at that scale.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Yes that's how a company makes money...continue, you can do this!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah. That's how it works. They get money either from serving you ads or exempting you from the ad service. Either way they get money.

[–] ZombiFrancis 5 points 1 week ago

Advertising is a racket. Always has been.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

"I"m playing both sides so that I come out on top?"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Still better than old school linear tv, where you paid to watch things being constantly interrupted by paid commercials.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Moonoopooly babey

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I mean...yeah. Ads subsidize viewers that can't/won't pay. That's the whole system. Did you expect something else?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I'm astounded at how much is available on the internet at no/little cost. Think how valuable our data must be for them to continue providing it.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›