this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
231 points (99.6% liked)

politics

19156 readers
2610 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Even if people know about it, will the average person care or at least care enough to sway their vote? Everyone's more worried about egg prices, gas or if their favorite college football team won.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

It mattered in several states. Missouri added a right to abortion to the state constitution. Even as the people voted for the assholes behind the ban in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yup. We already know what America will look like with these bans. But these idiot Republicans think it'll be swept under the rug like before. Abortion was banned in the 1920s and the number of women who's obituaries that say shit like, "Jane Doe died suddenly due to unknown causes" is staggering. They would never mention the woman died was pregnant. Or they would say, "Jane Doe died due to undiagnosed blood loss."

Only difference now is that we free in the information age. There is no sweeping this under the rug and the main outcome is going to be the bottoming out of what remains of our birth rates. Pregnancy is literally to dangerous of a proposition for women in red states. Keep an eye on the yearly numbers of births per state. Women who do get pregnant and can afford to move will because very few pregnancies go 100% perfect. Poor woman will resort to back alleyway abortions more often than they would have when abortion was legal.

What these pro rapist people don't understand is, if cave women could figure out ways to end their pregnancy so can modern women. (Please for the love of God don't take this as an enforcement of unsafe abortions but I know what path I'd take if the shoe was on the other foot.)

There's always a short term bump in teen and poor births when bans go into place. But you'll see. Red states will quickly become Childless hell scape very soon.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Only difference now is that we free in the information age. There is no sweeping this under the rug and the main outcome is going to be the bottoming out of what remains of our birth rates.

They can still effectively hide this information from the typical dumbass. The mediascape is so much narrowcasting and so bifurcated that a lot of people that choose to live in willful ignorance (the fauxbrained) will continue to do so. People that are not intentionally locking out any evidence but are basically low-info/passive consumers of things like Youtube, etc....will still probably be influenced by algorithms that are more likely to red-pill them than to actually inform them.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Republicans believe that if a woman cannotgive birth, she does not deserve to live

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 hours ago

Yes, and also, they believe pregency complications are God's punishment for her sinful nature. The deaths are the point.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 7 hours ago

From what I've seen it's mostly non-white women dying from lack of abortive care and that's pretty much the law working as intended. Whatever the outcome they want minorities to suffer the most.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

A day after this story was published, the Washington Post reported that the Texas maternal mortality board would skip reviewing the deaths of pregnant women in 2022 and 2023 — conveniently, the first two years after the abortion ban went into place. The leadership claims it's about speeding up the review process, but of course, many members pointed out the main effect is that "they would not be reviewing deaths that may have resulted from delays in care caused by Texas’s abortion bans."

...

That is the trap of misogyny. It allows women like Lila Rose or Ingrid Skop to pretend that, if you submit to the sexist order and obey all their arbitrary rules, you'll be saved. But these laws punish all women and girls: mothers and non-mothers, wives and single women, women who've had 100 partners and those who were virgins when raped. Abortion bans make crystal clear that, to the Christian right, no woman's life is worth saving. Anyone can be sacrificed, to protect their cruel patriarchal order.

They are fully mask off at this point, and we gave them 4 years of clean open road to entrench as much of this shittiness as they can.

gg America

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 hours ago

That's giving them too much credit. They actually enjoy killing people. All their policies are designed to kill people. Healthcare, policing, environment, you name it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 hours ago

when life is considered within the gradations of hierarchy....