this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
141 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19156 readers
2610 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Shocked Pikachu face that voting to protect abortion rights while continuing to vote for Republicans will result in no abortion rights for your state.

Faces and leopards.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 93 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There is an exception carved out in the amendment for cases in which a health care provider deems an abortion necessary to “protect the life or physical or mental health of the pregnant person.”

Texan here. Those exceptions don't do shit.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 day ago

Yup. No legal definition of what counts as medically necessary or what health of the pregnant person is so no one will do a thing under that of what the nebulous, non legal term means under a theocrat AG.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Those exceptions don't do shit.

thanks for this. a reminder to scream this nugget of wisdom into the face of every "partial ban" supporter.

[–] ArbitraryValue 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No leopards here. The title of the article is deceptive because it implies that the attorney general is acting contrary to the new amendment. Actually that amendment explicitly allows for abortion after viability to be illegal.

Do you want to amend the Missouri Constitution to:

establish a right to make decisions about reproductive health care, including abortion and contraceptives, with any governmental interference of that right presumed invalid;

remove Missouri’s ban on abortion;

allow regulation of reproductive health care to improve or maintain the health of the patient;

require the government not to discriminate, in government programs, funding, and other activities, against persons providing or obtaining reproductive health care;

and allow abortion to be restricted or banned after Fetal Viability except to protect the life or health of the woman?

(That's the text of the ballot measure. The longer text of the actual amendment is substantially similar. It is available in this pdf.)

The voters approved a ban on abortion after viability. They're not being surprised by this.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Yep. We approved it because it's that or continue with a total ban with no exceptions for rape or incest, to be clear. We had some of the strictest laws in the country on abortion, juxtaposed by some of the most lax on gun control.

Oh and we also just banned ranked choice voting, so. This state is weird.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Abortions after viability have generally been illegal since 1992 (Casey), long before Dobbs.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

just wait until some nutjob in jefferson city decides it would be a swell idea to redefine 'viability' to be six weeks.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

SOP for the state government here. I'm surprised we managed keep weed legal here.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I'm assuming too many rich old state legislators who railed on "the evil marijuana" are currently.making bank from financing/owning grow sites and dispensaries to even consider getting rid of legality.