this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
195 points (78.8% liked)

Memes

45893 readers
1042 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
195
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Check out my new community: [email protected]

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 month ago (18 children)

Why would an RTX 4090 make Python faster?

[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don’t worry this post was written by a first year computer science student who just learned about C. No need to look too closely at it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The only language worth discussing is brainfuck

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Purest of the programming languages

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago

Joke's on you, he was talking about "Phyton". /s

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

I bet an LLM could have written this meme without making that mistake.

Embarrassing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

The new favorite language of AAA game studios: ~~Phyton~~ Python

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm happy if it's actually running in python and not a javascript app with electron.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Idk, it's rare for an electron app to literally not even run. Meanwhile I'm yet to encounter a python app that doesn't require me to Google what specific environment the developer had and recreate it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I think with pyenv and pipenv/UV you can create pretty reliable packaging. But it's not as common as electron, so it's a pain.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

That's fair.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

With a properly packaged python app, you shouldn't even notice your running a python app. But yeah, for some reason there's a lot of them that ... aren't.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Ah yes, those precious precious CPU cycles. Why spend one hour writing a python program that runs for five minutes, if you could spend three days writing it in C++ but it would finish in five seconds. Way more efficient!

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Because when it is to actually get paid work done, all the bloat adds up and that 3 days upfront could shave weeks/months of your yearly tasks. XKCD has a topic abut how much time you can spend on a problem before effort outweighs productivity gains. If the tasks are daily or hourly you can actually spend a lot of time automating for payback

And note this is one instance of task, imagine a team of people all using your code to do the task, and you get a quicker ROI or you can multiply dev time by people

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That also goes to show why to not waste 3 days to shave 2 seconds off a program that gets run once a week.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can write perfectly well structured and maintainable code in Python and still be more productive than in other languages.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Welp, microcontrollers say hi

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Welp, I'm not saying you should use Python for everything. But for a lot of applications, developer time is the bottleneck, not computing resources.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

So, I've noticed this tendency for Python devs to compare against C/C++. I'm still trying to figure out why they have this tendency, but yeah, other/better languages are available. 🙃

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

"Python is bloat" wait until you look at NodeJS "node_modules" folder

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I know it makes me sound like an of man shouting at clouds but the other day I installed Morrowind and was genuinely blown away by how smooth and reliable it ran and all the content in the game fitting in 2gb of space. Skyrim requires I delete my other games to make room and still requires a whole second game worth of mods to match the stability and quantity of morrowind.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

High res textures (especially normal maps) and higher quality/coverage audio really made game sizes take off. Unreal's new "Nanite" tech, where models can have literally billions of polygons, actually reduces game size because no normal maps.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

That's fair, though honestly the only issue I ever had on the Xbox was having a loading screen every 5 minutes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, but also community rewrite of the Morrowind engine, to make it even more better: https://openmw.org/

Admittedly, some changes might make it use more resources, for example it's got basically no loading screens, because nearby cells get loaded before you enter them...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I'm actually giving that a try now because it comes packaged with bazzite! I just wish I could figure out modding lol

[–] baggachipz 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Love you homie 💋 walks away

[–] CanadianCarl 6 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Armatures, I only write software using my hammer by punching holes in steel plates.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

It used to be pretty terrible, but the frameworks are getting there, starting with the languages they are based on.

Believe it or not, Java has been optimized a ton and can be written to be very efficient these days. Another great example of a high-level, high-efficiency language is Julia. And then there is Rust of course, which basically only sacrifices memory-efficiency for C-speeds with Python-esque comfort. It's getting better.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

plus all the spying and the "telemetry" bs

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tbh this all seems to be related to following principles like Solid or following software design patterns. There's a few articles about CUPID, SOLID performance hits, etc

  • it all suggests that following software design patterns cost about a decade of hardware progress.
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Absolutely not lol.

If SOLID is causing you performance problems, it's likely completely solvable.

Most companies throwing out shitty software have engineers who couldn't tell you what SOLID is without looking it up.

Most people who use this line of reasoning don't have an actual understanding of how often patterns are applied or misapplied in the industry and why.

SOLID might be a bottle neck for software that needs to be real-time compliant with stable jitter and ultra-low latency, the vast majority of apps are just spaghetti code.

load more comments
view more: next ›