this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
394 points (93.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53370 readers
1796 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

To be clear, this is just a joke, and I don't look down on direct downloading. It absolutely has its place, and sometimes I do it myself if it's just faster to download a file directly. Torrenting is just so much more convenient, though, especially when using Jackett's manual search.

(page 2) 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Are torrent search engines built into clients an older feature nowadays? I remember uTorrent having it years ago but as a qbittorrent user I tried the search plugins and they were pretty much all broken and outdated, especially as many only worked for a single tracker.

I went with sonarr and radarr for the full beans

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I just started sailing again and all the torrents i want for my fav bands are stuck at 0. So i've started getting songs one by one from that website that takes them from deezer i found on here.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Am I the only one that uses Medusa to auto download shows?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I have never heard of Medusa and it seems pretty outdated compared to Sonarr.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

i direct download cause i dont have a vpn

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Oh ma gaaahh REALLY???? Qbittorrent has a search engine??????

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›