this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
186 points (93.9% liked)

Lemmy NSFW

11890 readers
3 users here now

Updates about lemmynsfw.com

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
186
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Currently downvotes are enabled on a trial basis, this was done by me to see if they can be enabled to prevent spam from rising to the top of communities, along with the fact that is another form of interaction/feedback.

However I've gotten some pushback for this and so I'd like to see the general consensus of this decision. Please put any comments/concerns in this thread, and please vote here: (Link gone poll is done)

the results of this poll and the comments will determine if we keep or remove downvotes again

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago

Ability to downvote is an important part of these communities, it's a self control mechanism. I surely don't want to block some users just because I don't like some of their posts, downvote should suffice.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I changed my mind. I was pro downvote but I just looked at the new community list, saw one I liked, and then saw that a lot of the posts that fit the theme just fine have been downvoted for no reason. The mod is clearly upset about it also.

So yeah, please turn downvotes back off.

[–] blockheadjt 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How do you know that there was no reason behind the downvotes?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

True. I mean no discernable reason.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

I can see a lot of pros and cons, and I don't think we can know what is best without a longer-term trial. There'll be some trolling and harassment that comes with it, which is really bad, but also it allows user filtering of spam and junk posts, which is good. Hopefully there's less of the former and more of the latter.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago

Maybe it's just me, but after enabled I seem to get much higher quality content on the local page.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Nope. I'm seeing male posters getting downvoted, which sucks. Everyone should be welcome in all communities unless the community states otherwise or a post is off-topic.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Yeah, just filter stuff you don't wanna see. There's a person behind the post you're downvoting

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

I've just counted 100 communities I had to block to get a semi interesting "local" feed, in addition to 7 posters who were really not my taste. How many hentai/anime communities are really needed for example? So yes, downvoting makes sense as long as there is a local feed, that's how lemmy works.

And yes, I have witnessed a clear improvement since downvotes are back.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Every downvote on pro-downvote comments should count as a vote for re-enabling. Clearly they're okay with downvotes, at least when it suits them haha

[–] blockheadjt 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If 10 people downvote 10 pro-downvote comments, your algorithm would count that as 100 votes against downvotes. Didn't think that one through, did ya?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 days ago

Shoot you found the flaw in my system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

Good job, a few saved posts from my saved list have been replaced by blanks. And who can blame the ones who did it? (Many will, considering these did get a bit of abusive words despite doing some good things). This place has become a place to debate and argue rather than have a good jerk. Ha! Just what was needed.

Being a bit of a dick is normal, so it is tolerated, and opinions are given importance, these dickheads are given respect for abusing the very ones who made this place work. What's next now? Enforcing moderation on those who answer back to them? It is the norm in the more corporate forums so I—would—not—be—surprised—at—all. Good job all.

Hehe… who could've seen this coming. The majority of good willing people here couldn't, how surprising🫢 If the world had more silent thinking (which is my style) and less debating (which was how things were before this slight seemingly insignificant change, a change which incited the question of whether each posting itself was right or wrong), these things wouldn't happen… but it is not the place of idiots like me to interrupt the legitimate high-placed people of the world from shooting their own feet so… carry on. It is amusing in itself. I'll start a casual bet (smiles on wager, so the world benefits from it) on just how much everyone among these well intentioned ones choose to ignore the results out of embarrassment. I say the majority will be too embarrassed to even talk about it again, as if it never happened, and try to shut down anyone who references it for being 'incorrect' or 'wrong'😁 Better yet, some will blame and insult the few posters who deleted everything. That will definitely happen.

How ironic is it that for the sake of arguing for good quality posts, you would drive away the posters of some of the best quality posts💀

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'd want it enabled only for people who are subbed to the community in question. That solves practically all issues.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

Was tried before. Didn't work.

load more comments
view more: next ›