this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
117 points (92.7% liked)

196

16704 readers
2196 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

backwards compatibility is pog

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 month ago (2 children)

My Steam Deck is backwards compatible with all Nintendo consoles.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

i also have a steamdeck. i just thought it was neat that this was confirmed, its not deeper than that

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

large if verifiable

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Backwards compatiblity for one generation is the bare minimum.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

Why make your games backwards compatible, if you can rerelease them for a premium? 🤑

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

well i think the switch was only not backwards compatible with the wii u because like the switch from discs to cartridges and from power pc to arm like it just wasnt feasible i reckon. switch 2 from the leaks seems to be just a higher powered and slightly bigger nintendo switch so backwards compatibility is a no brainer. but its good to have the confirmation

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

These are all shortcomings because backwards compatiblity was not a consideration. Compare the Wii, which essentially had a whole GameCube in it for backwards compatiblity.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

I prefer this announcement instead. I like Nintendo games but hate the company for taking down emulators and sueing indie devs for a really dumb reason.

lol (image)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

would be even better if they had not killed all the emulators...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

my guess is the backwards compatibility is the reason they went after those because it means switch 2 games are probably as easy to emulate as switch games, as they share the same structure, operating system and so on. they probably didnt like that. im not shilling for nintendo with this meme, i just thought it was neat to get that confirmed because we didnt really know what the case would be.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

This is precisely the reason they killed them though

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I mean yeah backwards compatibility is great, but we've seen this before. We lost the GBA slot in the DSI and 3DS. WiiU removed GameCube Disk functionality. They cut backwards compatibility when they stop producing the previous generation's media. This isn't the extension of the Switch's lifespan, it's the beginning of it's death.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The WiiU was a successor console to the Wii, not a midlife refresh.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

That's my point. We lose backward compatibility in the next console.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

maybe altho they seem more keen to work on a single system and have it be more of an upgrade each time. also its worth pointing out that leadership at nintendo has changed quite a bit and they restructured the whole company in 2015 in order to focus on just one system at a time. So who knows. All I can say is its good to have it confirmed that the next system is backwards compatible, because we werent 100% on that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What I want to know is if Switch 2 will be able to run Switch 1 games at a higher clock speed, or if it'll just do what N3DS did. My fear is that every game that ought to be running on Switch 2 already got ported to Switch 1 poorly, and won't get re-ported.

[–] activ8r 1 points 1 month ago

If there is one thing we can be sure of, it's that there will be an updated version of Skyrim for the Switch 2.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

surely they'd have to go out of their way to make it not be backwards compatible?

[–] priapus 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A lot of past Nintendo consoles have made pretty major changes to the hardware and operating system compared to other console manufacturers, which makes backwards compatibility less likely. The Wii U basically booted into the Wii operating system to play those games. I imagine getting Wii U games running on the Switch wouldn't be the easiest thing to do, though certainly not impossible. We don't know a ton about what changes the Switch successor will make, so it wasn't outside the realm of possibility that it would be the same.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm excited, even though the odds of me buying the new one in the near future are slim. Between all the Xenoblades, the new X remaster, Prime 4 and my other backlog I already have lots of games I can play on what I own. I'll wait on the inevitable 3D Mario, and only consider the thing when a new Xenoblade or Metroid launches (or if there's a day-one exploit, my current Switch is objectively the worst one they made 'cause it's patched but still with the bad battery life).

That said, the fact that more details regarding backwards compatibility even can be announced is worrying. You've already said it plays Switch software, anything added to that can only mean asterisks, right?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

i mean maybe they announce how to transfer your save data or if certain titles will get patches to improve performance. idk nintendo is often vague in these statements and "more info" could mean anything and nothing

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Anyone else think that was a pony tail until they sat up?