The title is so tone deaf that made me not wanna read the rest of the article.
Kamala didn’t represent hope. She represented the “nothing will fundamentally change” stance.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
The title is so tone deaf that made me not wanna read the rest of the article.
Kamala didn’t represent hope. She represented the “nothing will fundamentally change” stance.
Honestly, I think anybody who saw no hope in Harris wasn't paying attention, just validating their own hopelessness in a vacuum.
My sincere condolences for the near future of Americans, and especially for my and their close friends and family.
Have we absolutely ruled out foul play by the guy who constantly talks about election rigging, and also constantly projects his own lies, and also constantly cheats even with his own games of golf?
Morons. Morons everywhere.
I have deep sources telling me he got more votes.
All the networks!