politics

Wanted to add - not directly related to the above article, but kinda confirming the general environment:

"She hit me the other day," Trump said. "I was going to say to my people, 'Am I allowed to hit her now?'"
"They said, 'Take it easy, sir,'" Trump said.
"Well, what do you mean?" Trump replied to himself. "She said bad about me. I can't hit back?"
The conversation continued with Trump's imaginary staff pleading with the former president to "just relax."

This is from https://www.rawstory.com/michelle-obama-vs-trump/ but it's a series of direct quotes from the guy himself.

Hey, thanks for the long and thorough reply. I’m a bit overwhelmed :)

Yeah, I think we all are at this point. It's been a tough election year for everyone.

This is exactly where my doubts come from. The whole piece has the air of “conventional politics“

I can see how someone would see that. For me, the first thing that stood was how unconventional the candidate really is, even compared to his own, presumably super MAGA, team.

but at the same time, from an outside perspective, it looks like the whole party has been thoroughly streamlined towards their leader in the past 8 years.

It really does, doesn't it? Of course there's a major contingent that isn't still - ranging from those who are endorsing Harris to folks like Mitt Romney who believe in a post-MAGA GOP.

And a cult of MAGA would probably not resemble much of traditional politics.

So, we already know what it would look like. The guy is running for re-election, not for first-time election. The simple answer is that this guy went with folks like Rex Tillerson and John Kelly and H.R. McMaster in the first place because the pro-MAGA crowd, while enthusiastic, didn't have members who could fill in and do these jobs.

True, but who is Trump going to convince to switch sides a week before the election?

Well, certainly not me. SHHHHH, you don't tell him either!!!

You might as well turn up the rhetoric to 11 and say the quiet part out loud, in order to convince your own base to vote for you.

Except they were already going to turn out for him no matter what happened. So he didn't need to do that to convince them to get on board - he would have been better off listening to his more traditional advisors and keeping himself restrained to maintain the broadest possible coalition.

This is a slippery slope of course, and the outcome could either be losing people with this radicalisation or making sure even more radical people who did not plan to vote show up at the booth

.. and vote for the other candidate (Harris).

Yep, fortunately, he couldn't do he couldn't restraint himself, and hopefully not only the US but the whole world benefits when he loses - exactly for the reasons you state above.

It will be interesting to see if they can put a lid on it and return to politics that at the very least appears less crazy and unhinged in case Trump loses the election.

Spoiler alert: This won't happen. At least not right away. This isn't the first time - what we saw back in Jan 2021, we have every reason to expect again, and zero reasons not to.

And to deter people from voting for someone else, out of fear.

Sadly, I am seeing on the news that this may already be happening this election, regardless.

Also, even if it was possible for Trump to extend a hand and suddenly appear reasonable who would believe him after all that happened?

So the point of the article, or at least the claim they are trying to make, is to state that the MAGA candidate was doing really well prior to these dog whistles, and at least some folks on his campaign along with some senior traditional Republican strategists attributed it to him having appeared reasonable and not crazy. Then afterwards, the dog whistles ruined things moments before reaching the finish line.

I guess he doesn’t have a choice but take the route of last-minute radicalisation.

Again, the article is claiming he did have a choice - and that he would have been better off not taking this late-minute route. As I wrote earlier this also seems to be backed up somewhat by the polling.

Of course, just because the article claims something doesn't mean they're right. A healthy dose of skepticism is reasonable and in this case, warranted. But at least parts of it seem plausible, based on what we know from living under him after he took office in 2017, along with the recent changes happening in the polls for 2024.

We’ll see how this turns out. Personally I am so sick of seeing the orange conman dominate public discourse worldwide for eight years in a row. It is time to move on and I can only hope the majority of Americans has had enough too.

Same here. Remember he lost the popular vote in 2016? So yes, the majority was likely already sick of him back them. And then he lost it by a larger margin in 2020.

I doubt he'd be running in 2028. He'd be older than Biden is now (who is already the oldest US President ever I think), and he'll likely be incarcerated then too if he's lost. (Remember, he's already been convicted of federal crimes, he is just awaiting sentencing - I think November 26 was one expected date).