I don't know if I like it or if I hate it. On one hand they're literally stealing the content off those sites, and on the other hand the sites kind of deserve it for telling me their whole life story before I get to the recipe.
this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
47 points (98.0% liked)
Technology
1326 readers
317 users here now
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
[email protected]
[email protected]
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
Yeah, but them telling you their life stories is also Googles fault...
Really? I always assumed it was about ad revenue by making you view more webpage.
I think it's seo and ad revenue, but who dictates the rules for ad revenue? Obviously not just Google, but yeah still pretty much at fault.
Yes, SEO
search optimizing... And who defines search
A little bot of both probably :)
Does Google care if the content is there but hidden with CSS? I don't think you need to actually torture the users.
Hidden text or color matched text has resulted in an SEO penalty since like 2003.
That wouldnt keep users trapped on the site as long. Trapping the users on the site longer makes Google rank it higher.
Google has been trying to steal people's content since before they rolled out AMP. Google views users and creators both as roadblocks to their money.
I'm sure Google will treat every recipe equal and not promote only sites/creators that offer kickbacks /s
I mean, whenever I use Google these days I just scroll down all the way and work my way up. It's basically subconscious at this point and it's surprisingly helpful. Makes Google actually useful again.
time to split google up.