this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
1160 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59598 readers
3336 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Clearly, Google is serious about trying to oust ad blockers from its browser, or at least those extensions with fuller (V2) levels of functionality. One of the crucial twists with V3 is that it prevents the use of remotely hosted code – as a security measure – but this also means ad blockers can’t update their filter lists without going through Google’s review process. What does that mean? Way slower updates for said filters, which hampers the ability of the ad-blocking extension to keep up with the necessary changes to stay effective.

(This isn’t just about browsers, either, as the war on advert dodgers extends to YouTube, too, as we’ve seen in recent months).

At any rate, Google is playing with fire here somewhat – or Firefox, perhaps we should say – as this may be the shove some folks need to get them considering another of the best web browsers out there aside from Chrome. Mozilla, the maker of Firefox, has vowed to maintain support for V2 extensions, while introducing support for V3 alongside to give folks a choice (now there’s a radical idea).

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Right? I don't think anyone using Chrome with adblockers is just gonna be like "oh well, guess we got ads now"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Come and join me in Firefox and try out container tabs. Super powerful when you're trying to keep home and work identities seperate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

~laughs in firefox~

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

The Fox has been re-promoted to my daily driver as of this year. Chrome still in play for work stuff & sites don't have ads.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

One of the reasons why I left chomium based browsers even ungoogled chromium (I use chromium alongside firefox but mainly firefox)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My Chromebook heard about it and a few weeks ago developed a display issue. I’m now looking for a new laptop that allows Firefox browser. It’s kind of funny how things work out.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wait, a Chromebook won't let you use any browser other than than Chrome?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Comeon 0.0001%! Let’s get those last 5 people who know what an extension is but were holding out for…???

Yeah… These articles are like reading the tally marks on a prison wall. Let it go.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Opera GX users rejoice

https://github.com/Godiesc/firefox-gx

You don’t have to relearn a layout

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

When new fearures added to V3, will Mozilla port it to V2 too?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I'm wondering how Apple will handle this in Safari.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›