this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
19 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

63 readers
1 users here now

A community for news and discussion about the hardware side of technology.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Using 160 MHz channels results in speeds effectively equivalent to Wi-Fi 6.

all 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

did the wifi organization really pull a USB 3 on us

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Minor note: considering MLO, WiFi 7 with 6Ghz/160 is definitely not equivalent to WiFi 6.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Pretty sure these boards are all using the same Intel module.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

Aren't wifi on motherboards all just the same little M.2 cards in an enclosure?