I'm curious if the state couldn't declare imminent domain and remove the houses?
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
The state is required to pay the owners when they do that. If you just let them collapse, then they don't have to pay.
So they're just not going to clean it up? Dear God.
It's a lot cheaper to clean up what's left of a house than to buy a habitable structure
So are they? I rta but didn't see it mentioned, but a friend was messaging me at the time, so I may have missed it.
Past ones got cleanup, though I don't know which government did it.
I found this. It looks like we simply need to tax the wealthy at appropriate rates and nationalize all insurance.