Ridiculous. Publicly funded means propaganda for the state. It's a No for me, dawg.
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
97 points (99.0% liked)
BrainWorms
1227 readers
6 users here now
Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.
This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Plenty of private companies get public funding and say and do whatever they want. We already have PBS and NPR, we should just increase their budgets.
I disagree. PBS and NPR have deep political biases in their programming. Either remove the biases, or scrap the programs. I don't need entities telling me how to think, I will review facts and come to my own conclusions.
As for private companies that get public funding...that's a bit vague, so I can't comment on that.
If you think NPR and PBS have deep political biases you aren’t reviewing the facts correctly.
If you think they don't have deep political biases, you need to step out of your echo chamber and breathe some fresh air.
Agree with this, too. The very reason why it used to work was because of the notion and protection of "the free press." Now that competition in journalism is so fierce, surprisingly, the quality has gone down, not up, as one might expect. Some may disagree with this, but it's the way I see it. When I read an article from a journalist, it's either very shallow, missing answers to some very obvious questions, or it's heavily opinionated with regard to politics. Or all three! You may or may not agree, but that's my experience and opinion thus far.