this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
373 points (98.7% liked)

Games

32512 readers
1508 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

why is Nintendo going after pokemon with guns and not that one game that popped up on the steam home page (I disabled NSFW tags) that's literally just 2d Pokemon but if you beat the trainer you fuck them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Because, like many, you can't remember the name of that game, but just about everyone knows about Palworld.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

I will continue to never give Nintendo any of my money on account of their litigiousness.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Patent infringement is a curious angle. Do we know what specific patent(s) they're claiming here?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Obligatory fuck Nintendo!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Nintendo files suit against a Pocketpair of deez nuts.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder if they are going to go after the monster tamer genre as a whole ar some point. I can see them going after tem tem, coromon, nextmon, etc...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

None of those made hundreds of millions of dollars.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Digimon did, right? Why didn't they ever go after that?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›