this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
278 points (95.1% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3523 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“Asked how many members of the House of Reps there were, Stein guessed 600-some before hosts corrected her.”

(page 2) 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

I would have had to guess too, but I'm not in politics where that's something I should know. What I do know and would have answered is "not the right proportion to the population".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It's actually a harder question than it seems... If you're asking about the number of seats, that's easy. 435 in the House, 100 in the Senate.

But if you ask about the PEOPLE, suddenly a lot harder due to deaths, resignations, and vacancies.

I legit couldn't tell you the number of people right now without looking it up and I'd like to think I'm pretty plugged in.

https://clerk.house.gov/Members/ViewVacancies

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Where I live we get lots of local candidates who are some combination of democrat-green-progressive-working family alliances. Building coalitions from the bottom up like that, and showing that people with “green” in their bio can really be elected, is the way to move things forward. At the national level, the two-party system is far too entrenched to have a third party be anything but a defacto spoiler that turns off their own supporters more that anything else.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (9 children)

Alleged russian agents aside:

I actually have no problem with a politician not remembering the exact number of House representatives there are. That number actively does not matter because it is never a case of "I need 435 to vote for this". It isn't even "I need 218". It is "After checking with everyone, we need to convince five more people to vote with us".

But there are definitely ways to answer that convey that. Guessing a number and hoping you got it right is... not.


Also, because I had no idea and other people in this thread are outright wrong:

435 in the house. 100 in the senate. And 3 electors for DC and Puerto Rico (?) who don't get a say in legislature because Yes Taxation Without Representation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Also, because I had no idea and other people in this thread are outright wrong:

Who?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

which is how you get the number 538, like the website or the total number of electoral votes

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

No. Just no fuck that. That's the dumbest fucking thing I've ever heard.

The President is the head of the Executive Branch of the US government. As much as it is analogous to a corporation, the position of President is akin to CEO.

Do you think it would ever be acceptable for the chief executive officer of an organization responsible for the well being of hundreds of millions of people to not know how many board members they have?

You might not know this if you grew up in Russia, but the number of Representative in the US House is something we learn very early on. It is one of the first and most basic civics lessons Americans learn.

It's one thing for ignorant adult Americans to not know there are 435 Reps. But the President of the United States? Are you having a fucking laugh?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 days ago

Salon - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Salon:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.salon.com/2024/09/12/jill-stein-schooled-on-in-brutal-breakfast-club-interview/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›