Betteridge's Law says no. Should they though? Hell yeah!
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
Yeah they need to remove the question mark, of fucking course they do. Any meaningful question should be is it "cruel and unusual" to force these environmental prisoners to clean up toxic environmental waste for the rest of their lives?
Never heard of it happening, so I'm going to go with "no". Whenever it comes up, it's always just a "cost of doing business" type of scenario where the eventual fine and damages don't outweigh the potential gains, which means they all do it and will continue doing it.
Have a listen to the podcast .. youβll be surprised as to how much traction itβs getting.
Cool stuff, I'll start using "ecocide" in the wild. Or rather, on concrete.
You can make it wild as well, with a moss graffiti: https://thursd.com/articles/the-art-of-moss-graffiti-and-how-to-do-it-yourself
Capital protects capital.
Technically the various local, State, and Federal police forces do that, but it's semantics.
I would say they're captured by capital. But yea. The enforcers of the ruling class.
Lol! Good one
Laws do not apply to the rich.
This is the correct energy.