Whoever filled the patent obviously didn't consider the optics of this. I'm in the market for a new car and was considering a Ford. This will factor into my decision.
Technology
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
Can't wait for Ford revanced.
Not to defend the mega corporation, but companies file patents for ridiculous things all the time that never end up actually being made or used.
Yeah this was probably some rank and file employee that was trying to cash in on that sweet patent filing bonus Ford probably provides
Exactly. A few months ago the headline was a patent of Roku hijacking HDMI to show ads.
I'll save my energy to be pissed off when this garbage actually makes it to market.
If it's MY car why would adverts be in it? What's next, adverts in my shed?
They would beam them into your brain if they could.
Lightspeed briefs: for the discriminating crotch
If it’s MY car why would adverts be in it?
Because you're too poor to afford the monthly payment on the ad-free model.
US Citizen Patents A Way To Not Buy Ford Cars
"The system can listen to conversations".
What a timely coincidence! Patent got published basically at the same time Meta's, Google's and Microsoft's "Active Listening" got public as well. 🤔
if there's a really good way to bring ads inside your car, I'm happy someone patented it. it means fewer people will use it
Oh good, I wouldn't want to escape the barrage of ads, ever.
Please drink verification Coors Light to continue
as is traditional, one of our corporate innovators seeks to protect citizens (never simply consumers, no, no!) with a defensive patent - sure to now be locked away in a safe until natural corporate patent expiration 1000 years hence.
now and forevermore we shalll sing in praise of this beneficent corporate citizen and their efficacious lawyerly thrust deep into the heart of our once inevitable (but now vanquished) future boring dystopia of ads beamed directly into our brains 24/7.
Imagine trying to use your finger to click the tiny x of the ad that covered your windshield while you're on the highway
They would never do that, that would be dangerous. But at red lights, or when you first start the motor, or at the gas station? Oh you betcha betcha betcha
Maybe, just maybe Ford is doing all these horrid patents so they can just hold on to them so no one can make them... Would actually be pretty brilliant . That being said wayze already has ads.
Where is Ned Ludd when you need him?
Opening your door brought to you by Walmart.
OK fine but you better let me watch YouTube on my infotainment then since it's just as distracting
Well thats gonna jumpstart sales innit
In Ford v. Chevy, there is now a front runner for the shittiest.
My liking for Ford after this: 📉📉📉
Consume beverage to clear windshield from ads
What if you could lease a car in exchange for watching ads and maybe even potentially displaying them for others to see…
No thanks, I'll keep pedaling.
Message received: Install ad screens on bikes.
I'd much rather people focus on the road when they're behind the wheel, thanks.
I'll sooner murder a marketing executive