this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
274 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4466 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
274
Election Deniers Secretly Pushed Rule That Would Make It Easier to Delay Certification of Georgia’s Election Results (www.propublica.org)
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Georgia’s GOP-controlled State Election Board is poised to adopt a rule on Monday that would give county election board members an additional avenue to delay certification of election results, potentially allowing them to throw the state’s vote count into chaos this fall.

A former Fulton County election official who submitted an initial draft of the rule told ProPublica that she had done so at the behest of a regional leader of a right-wing organization involved in challenging the legitimacy of American election systems. That organization, the Election Integrity Network, is led by Cleta Mitchell, who helped orchestrate attempts to overturn the 2020 election and spoke on the callin which former President Donald Trump demanded that Georgia’s secretary of state “find” him 11,780 votes to undo Joe Biden’s victory.

The Election Integrity Network’s role in bringing forward the proposed rule has not been previously reported.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 months ago (2 children)

"Election deniers" is an inaccurate description.

They're fraudsters and seditionists, pure and simple. All of their efforts in 2020 were to effectively overthrow the US government by fraudulently handing the election to Trump, and since they failed, all of their efforts since then have been to try to make it so that they can succeed in 2024.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

All too true. I'm so tired of euphemism being used for these awful people. I had to laugh when the right cried tears over how the media was calling the J6 an insurrection and the people in it insurrectionists.

That's being overly nice to these people. What they were engaged in would more properly be called terrorism and the people engaged in it should be called terrorists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Fuck the unAmerican, unpatriotic assholes for cheating and stealing the very foundations of our ideals. This is what happens when these people weren't held accountable for January 6th and the first attempt to overthrow our government. If they had been held accountable, they would not be able to hold government positions and oversight positions over the very things they tried to overthrow. They should have been charged with felonies and lost their right to vote, quite honestly.

We've depended upon the courts to prevent the next insurrection, but they see either already corrupt as we're seeing with the SC, or they're toothless due to lack of precedent in this.

We're sleep walking into another civil war and the result will not depend upon right or wrong, but will be dependent upon who wields the power and weapons. We can't depend upon the government or the military doing the right thing as trump will get rid of all the barriers that existed 4 years ago.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)

People are paying way too little attention to this. It has become clear that Trump's intention is to use his army of MAGA cultists to cheat much more effectively than he did in 2020... and in 2020 he almost succeeded.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

People are paying way too little attention to this.

The media conveniently ignores it. Loads of media companies are for profit instead of reporting what's going on. Media is needed in a democracy. Unfortunately media being a business makes them easy to be bought.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Also, with this, it makes it wayyyyy too hard for them to revert to their stupid "both sides" narratives and being "objective", "neutral", etc...

If they were to properly report it, it's not like they can credibly claim "both sides" on election shenanigans...for example, letting cons bleat about mail-in voting as if it's some nefarious plot only makes the cons look ridiculous to most people. So if the corporate media downplays this, it is not surprising at all.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Why don't these dumbfucks work on trying to win due to, oh I don't know, a popular platform?

Instead of all this fuckery?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago

NPR - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for NPR:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Propublica - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Propublica:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.npr.org/2021/01/06/953823383/attorney-on-call-with-trump-and-georgia-officials-resigns-from-law-firm
https://www.propublica.org/article/georgia-election-board-vote-certification
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support