Photon

243 readers

3 users here now

Photon for Lemmy

A client for the fediverse designed to be intuitive, fast, and beautiful.

Share your themes, ask questions, report bugs, or check on the latest updates here!

founded 8 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

How would you feel about this feature? (files.catbox.moe)

submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been messed around with random features in photon, and i tried something stupid today.

I was experimenting with an AI post summary feature, (just because i wanted an excuse to make a cool animation) but as I was using it, it actually ended up kind of useful.

If I were to implement this feature, it would only work like this:

The user would have to opt-in manually.
The user would need to specify what AI service they wish to use.
The user would have to specify their own API key, if the service requires one.

In the end, I probably won't add this, since you can just copy/paste the content into an AI app. But it could also be slightly more convenient.

What do you think?

top 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Apart from the general "AI" issues and there are plenty, this specific implementation would encourage people to not participating in the conversations and being a passive user, which I see as a huge downside.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

And the "couldn't be bothered to read the linked article, but will comment with a shitpost about the headline only" people are already bad enough as they are...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't disagree with that, but your assumption that "AI" will improve the situation is not only unfounded, but known to worsen the situation. Just look at other "AI" social media and how they are doing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hmm? Yes I mean it will make it worse of course.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Sorry, misread what you actually wrote. Time for bed.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago

Thats why i think having the feature summarize the linked article would be useful

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I already said this in the matrix room, but i think that feature would be much better as a link action that summarizes linked articles instead, it might help with notreadingthearticlebeforecommenting-itus

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I wonder what happened to the Auto TLDR bot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

People didnt interact with it all that much so i assume the dev didnt feel like continuing

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I wouldn't use it, but I don't think I have any reason to say you shouldn't add it, except maybe that it's more bloat. Compared to media bias, it seems less useful and more effort to maintain.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

This is super cool! Yeah you can copy and paste but it's harder to copy the entire thread with all the comments because you'd need to expand them all. I would probably feel more skeptical if it wasn't bring-your-own API - it'd be neat to be able to hook this up to my local ollama instance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Personally not a fan of this, wouldn't use it, but also wouldn't mind if other people wanted to have it. Maybe nice to hide it from the UI in the options?