this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
446 points (97.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

9666 readers
61 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Derby, CT is a small, working-class, post-industrial town with a population which has been stagnant at about 12,000 for more than six decades.

The geniuses over at the Connecticut DOT decided that this obviously meant that the town's Main Street needed to be widened, by twice the size, destroying a number of historic buildings and uprooting numerous small community businesses in the process. That red stripe on the far left of the "After" pic is the new edge of the street.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 141 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Congrats. Your small peaceful town is about to become a gas stop on the side of an interstate highway expansion.

Either it will boom and you'll all be gentrified out. Or it'll bust and dwindle away to literally a gas stop.

Flip a coin.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure the local business community (on the side that wasn't torn down) was all for it because it would bring so much more traffic to their business, but they'll soon discover they lost all foot traffic and nobody driving will stop either because they're going too fast to even see that there's a business there.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

well, let em suffer then.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

I see it mostly depending on where the Walmart goes..

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Cars (2006)

[–] [email protected] 75 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They widened it to add protected bike lanes, right?

[–] [email protected] 58 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They should remove the buildings on the other side, too.
Businesses can then operate directly out of the bed of a semi truck, and housing is provided by rental RVs.
For recreation, you can race from one stoplight to the next, or coal-roll some cyclists.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

not that we would propose any locals be forced to cycle. convict cyclists will be imported.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 months ago

The before photo already had far too much road for a small town.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Lol, they demolished half the town for this?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

well, yeah; cars gotta live somewhere.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

half of the eight houses yes

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago

Just one more lane bro. All your problems will be fixed.

[–] marble 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They needed to fix that overhead cable that didn't meet in the middle.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

it's a screenshot from streetview where such issues often occur when the images are stitched together

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago

Beautiful stroadside shopping

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

But think of the profits (those go to few individuals, elected people included). Very very short term profits that overall cause a net loss for everyone.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

Are you sure it was the Connecticut DoT? It sounds like the mayor sold out your city.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago

Hey now, some of those are 30, nearly 40 years old!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Probably in the Derby CT history books.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Let's face it, those buildings were making traffic worse.

/s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

probably true. they gave people a reason to go downtown after all.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

This looks like a before after, but in the wrong order

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Sad truth is more people drive through that town than to that town.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It looks a little awkward during construction but it'll all come together nicely once they put those buildings back up

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

Narrator: Those buildings were not put back up

load more comments
view more: next ›