this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
60 points (91.7% liked)

Work Reform

9787 readers
77 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

In my experience they've dropped the hard requirement, but in my industry they still prioritize candidates by degree. So I mean, cool if the industry isn't currently saturated with applicants.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All things being equal, that doesn't seem like an unreasonable position.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

It isn't. I'm just suggesting that depending on industry, it may or may not change the status quo much.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

We've seen larger technology and software companies prioritize skills over degrees because of the speed at which the industry evolves.

1 in 3 companies are also firing developers :). This just smells like they're trying to lower dev compensation so they lower requirements, get more younger/cheaper devs and also use it as an excuse why your pay is not as high as it could be.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It makes sense. Fifty years ago, only the top ten percent of academic achievers went to university, now it's closer to fifty percent (in the UK).

There aren't an extra forty percent of jobs that require a uni level of education, qualifications are just being used as a trivial way to discriminate between potential applicants at great expense to students.

If our parents could get well paying jobs without needing a degree, then why shouldn't we?