this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
331 points (88.6% liked)

Technology

57432 readers
3273 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

After the House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary released a report accusing the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) of colluding with companies to censor conservative voices online, Elon Musk chimed in. In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Musk wrote that X "has no choice but to file suit against the perpetrators and collaborators" behind an advertiser boycott on his platform.

"Hopefully, some states will consider criminal prosecution," Musk wrote, leading several X users to suggest that Musk wants it to be illegal for brands to refuse to advertise on X.

Among other allegations, Congress' report claimed that GARM—which is part of the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA), whose members "represent roughly 90 percent of global advertising spend, or almost one trillion dollars annually"—directed advertisers to boycott Twitter shortly after Musk took over the platform.

Twitter/X's revenue tanked after Musk's takeover, with Bloomberg reporting last month that X lost almost 40 percent of revenue in the first six months of 2023 compared to the same period in 2022. That's worse than prior estimates last May, which put Twitter's loss around one-third of its total valuation. Ars chronicled the worst impacts of the ad boycott, including sharp drop-offs in the US, where an internal Twitter presentation leaked to The New York Times showed Twitter's ad revenue was down by as much as 59 percent "for the five weeks from April 1 to the first week of May" in 2023.

Last year, Musk sued other "collaborators" in the X boycott, including hate speech researchers, the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), and Media Matters for America (MMFA). However, his suit against the CCDH was dismissed this March, and Media Matters has claimed that Musk filing his MMFA lawsuit in Texas may be "fatal" because of a jurisdictional defect.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 269 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Man who claims hes a libertarian wants government to punish those who don't give him money.

[–] [email protected] 129 points 1 month ago (6 children)

For something that isn't a crime. Why are we feeding this troll attention? Let him fall off the face of the earth and all his "projects" fail.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago

With the way Tesla is tanking, I'll say

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Oh, nonono. You simply misunderstood him, because he's such a genius. Didn't you hear that he thinks he is literally the smartest engineer alive on this planet? Surely he's not following suit of other nutjobs and simply trying to weaponize the judicial system in his favor because he essentially has unlimited money? This guy?? Nooooo...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

He's also now donating to Trump, who I believe absolutely will punish people for Musk, if elected.

[–] [email protected] 101 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I could have sworn I read that Musk was a free speech absolutist. Freedom for me but not for thee?

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is the case with literally every conservative crowing about "free speech". They want full freedom for themselves so that no matter what they say there can't be any negative consequences or reactions, and everybody else can get fucked and die in an extermination camp

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

and the home of the braaaaaaave!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago

Nope he's just a fascist hiding behind free speech.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

Their obsession with “freeze peach” has always been a facade to their true desire which is to censor opposing viewpoints and make their viewpoints the only form of acceptable speech.

You’ll note that everything outside those bounds is “woke” and unacceptable

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

He certainly exercises his free speech to lie about his advocacy for free speech.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Musk wants freedom of speech for people. But his definition of "people" is very, very narrow.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 100 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Can X sue Musk for telling advertisers to go fuck themselves rather than addressing their concerns over his dumpster fire decisions?

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago (11 children)

He privatized and fired the board, remember? Nobody else inside to hold him accountable for being a non-stop fuckup.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 month ago (2 children)

When a business blames its customers for choosing to no longer be its customers, it's a sure sign the business is declining. Depending on the severity, it's often a sign the business is failing.

This applies here, as well as any time you see an article that millennials are killing <business/industry/etc>. It also applies when an entertainer blames their (potential) audience for not enjoying their work. See Jerry Seinfeld, Kid Rock, etc.

No one owes your business any patronage.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So this is the laser-like focus on the future of Tesla that 56 billion dollars bought, huh?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Such brilliant minds are truly beyond our understanding, clearly.

The neat thing is that if you have a 401k or mutual funds or whatever there’s a good chance your money voted to give this fuckwit his 56 billion. Looking at you, Vanguard.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

They're afraid that Tesla's stock price under a rational CEO will suffer a market correction and drop to where it should be. In other words, they want to keep Musk out of fear and greed.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Didn't Musk tell his advertisers to leave the platform if they didn't like Twitter anymore? Wouldn't that alone make any tort dead upon filing?

Yeah it ties up a few billable hours but we're not exactly talking about companies that can't afford it.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Didn't he tell them to "go fuck yourselves"?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah, he said something like “You try to blackmail me? With money? Go fuck yourselves”.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Til not buying things is blackmailing companies

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Receipts...

Say Elonald, why don't you follow your own advice...?

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 month ago

Musk wrote that X "has no choice but to file suit against the perpetrators and collaborators" behind an advertiser boycott on his platform.

So he's going to sue himself then?

If somebody is going to try to blackmail me with advertising, blackmail me with money, go fuck yourself. Go fuck yourself. Is that clear? I hope it is.

Elon Musk, 2023

I guess it was pretty clear. What a clown.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 month ago

Well I heard about a guy that told the collective advertisres of the platform to "go fuck themselves", maybe this guy should be investigated.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago

New law, everyone must be nice to me :(

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To that we say... Go fuck yourself?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was really hoping someone else said it already, but... is this really "Technology news"? It's about a billionaire and advertising on his social media website.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Social media's impact on society is relevant to technology. I would even say it is one of the most important questions in relation to technology today. So, how an owner tries to silence criticisms of his social media site for spreading fascism seems relevant to me.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago

Boycotts are speech. Calling for boycotts is speech. I’ve been told by every corporate leader and the Supreme Court that spending money is a form of speech. I would think that a free speech advocate would appreciate these things. Of course, like all outspoken libertarians, Musk’s positions are not well considered, consistent, nor actually libertarian when it doesn’t suit his own business or ideological* interests. This dude sucks at everything he does and his success perfectly demonstrates the fallacy of meritocracy in this society.

  • usually racist
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago

everybody's a libertarian until they lose money

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

But the free market....

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wasn’t he crying that he can’t be extorted with money or something? Fucking cry baby.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Dude literally told advertisers to go fuck themselves and is now like "well wait, I didn't mean it like that" lmao

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

advertising is the only competitive market left. I guess its easier for his ego to rationalize that everyone is teaming up against him than admit he's a moron.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

And now you know why he's donating to the Trump campaign.

Because with the shift of power with project 2025 he can actually do this.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

If he doesn't like being blackmailed he could always just fund Twitter himself.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What’s this? Another petty tyrant king demanding taxes from his serfs? These billionaires are fucked up in the head. They can’t just sit back, killing their livers, getting drunk and wasted on drugs on their yachts. No, they have to bend the world to their will at the expense of everyone else living in it. Even then, that isn’t enough.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So that is why he is donating to the Trump campaign. Best to get in the list of people he wishes to be persecuted sooner than later. Apparently it's first come first serve.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Meanwhile, toilets lobby to jail everyone that refuses to eat out of them.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Thank god this muppet wasn't born in the US, or he would definetely be making a presidential run. Maybe he will just try and pull a Trump and disrespect the constitution and try and change rules to benefit himself personally.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Man I'm super glad this guy can't run for president

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

TIL advertisement market is worth 1000 billion $.

Assuming 2 billion people owning an internet capable device, that's 500 $ per person.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's estimated to be around 66% of the global population, or 5.35b people... so $186.92 per person

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›