Teenagers are idiots. They're easy to manipulate, easy to traumatise. There's no good reason for a 16 yo to want to bang a 40-50 yo.
Teenagers need careful guidance, not absolute freedom.
A Place To Post Your Best Essays
Teenagers are idiots. They're easy to manipulate, easy to traumatise. There's no good reason for a 16 yo to want to bang a 40-50 yo.
Teenagers need careful guidance, not absolute freedom.
That's absurd. If teens were easy to manipulate they'd be doing all my yardwork for me for free :-)
They are notoriously stubborn, which is the opposite of easy to manipulate.
And their brains are much faster than older adults'. i.e. they learn everything much quicker. In some ways they are the smartest humans.
If they've been infantilized, and constantly told they're idiots, then, hey... take a minute to learn what a self-fulfilling prophecy is :-D
Plenty of countries all around the world all throughout history have respected the bodily autonomy of young adults aged 14-18 and they all did just fine. It's very strange that only now in the USA post 2010 are they suddenly brain-dead idiots. Hmmmmmm. Bizarre outlier.
You're clearly too inexperienced. There's nothing wrong with that - I simply wish you weren't so daft about it.
It'll come.
What exactly do you think I'm inexperienced at?
TIL I’m not normal. I’m old. Teens are not attractive to me. We have very little in common, they have no emotional maturity, and they haven’t gone through the trauma of raising a kid.. and they look like children. I’m currently mostly into middle aged women, with the youngest being late 20s/early 30s.
Are you advocating for legalizing sexual relations between a 14 year old and a 40 year old? If so, then I very much disagree. If not, and you’re advocating for kids to be free and explore relationships (with precautions), then, yeah, sure.
Trauma of raising a kid? You might be parenting wrong.
Hah! Kids are hard. It’s completely different on this side.
There's a difference between attractive and attractive :-D
Hetero men are attracted to boobs and hips, female secondary sexual characteristics. They are sexually aroused by that. This is simple biology.
The social things, the personality of a potential romantic partner is a completely different thing. That's mostly not biology. That's psychology.
My local priest is sexy as fuck. but I don't want to date him. He's a priest. and I'm married. See the difference?
I guess what I’m trying to tell you is that I don’t find teens “sexy as fuck”. I did, at one point, but now they remind me of children and I don’t find that sexually appealing.
Also I have found people “sexy as fuck” based on qualities that weren’t their looks. I’ve also had the inverse interaction where someone I was attracted to became unattractive because of their personality. I, at that point, did not want to have sex with them and no longer felt any attraction to them. So, I’m not sure your assertions hold true in my experience. I’d wager this is biological at some level, but I’m far from an expert in this area.
It’s not clear to me what you’re trying to get at here…
16 year olds are physically indistinguishable from 26 year olds. With a few changes in hair, make-up, and wardrobe 16 can pass for 26 and vice versa. People sexually aroused by 16 year old bodies are also aroused by 26 year old bodies, and vice versa. This is just an obvious fact.
I feel like you really want to justify being into underage girls. But, uhh, thanks for the conversation. I wish you the best.