this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
10 points (91.7% liked)

Australia

3480 readers
104 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/24630642 [email protected]

Highlights

  • This study investigates why specialist physician fees vary.
  • We consider variation between patients, physicians, specialties, and other factors.
  • We find variation between physicians dominates other sources.
  • Contrary to common beliefs, patient factors account for little of the variation.
  • Our results inform policy to improve price transparency in specialist care market.

More context:

Although Australia has a publicly funded health system that provides universal health coverage, about 44 % of the population holds private health insurance. Specialist physician fees in the private sector are unregulated; physicians can charge any price they want, subject to market forces.

We find that patient risk factors account for a small portion of the variance in fees and out-of-pocket payments

Physician-specific variation, responsible for much of the variation in total fees and OOP payments, could include physician characteristics that patients value, such as bedside manner, experience or reputation, or factors related to physicians’ circumstances or preferences. A key physician-level factor that may drive the variation is the perception of quality or skill differences between physicians. This perception can come from either consumers or physicians themselves about their quality or skill levels in comparison to other physicians in the physician's local market. [...] which can lead to large price variation and non-transparency of fees.

Recommendations

The government, private health insurers and physicians themselves could all play a more active role than they currently do. The government, for example, could mandate the disclosure of price and quality information for all procedures that receive government subsidies, insurers could provide incentives for the disclosure of such information, and physicians could change their referral practice to give preferences to other physicians who are willing to be transparent about their prices and quality.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hope this was ok to crosspost, I posted it on [email protected] but thought that it would be more helpful in an Australian community. I'm more familiar with the Canadian system, and while we have related issues, a lot of this was learning as well

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

My recent experience is that it costs $250-$300 an initial appointment and around half that for follow up appointments with Medicare (aus public medicine) rebating about $50 per visit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

The government, private health insurers and physicians themselves could all play a more active role than they currently do

The government certainly should. I'm not so sure about private health insurers. If anything, the government needs to stop the ridiculous mob-like behaviour threatening people to get private health insurance "or else".