It sounds like you want an Aeropress. You get the same results as a French press with a paper filter, and the whole process, including cleanup, is much more streamlined. It also stores a little easier.
this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
14 points (100.0% liked)
Coffee
8418 readers
1 users here now
☕ - The hot beverage that powers the world!
Coffee gadgets - It's always great to learn about new gadgets. Please share your favorite hardware or full setups. It might inspire newcomers to experiment!
Local businesses - Please promote your local businesses. If you are not the owner of the business you are promoting, kindly ask the owner if it's okay. It would be great if the business has a physical store to include an exterior or interior shot.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Have an aeropress. I find getting the brew right is almost as fussy as pour over but never quite as good. Also, I often brew larger batches. I like chemex for that but a 32oz FP would work. I know there's a mega aeropress out now, but I've heard it's clunky and kind of a pain. I just want to experiment with FP since that would be new to me (other than some messing around with it I did as a dumb college student).
Ah then yeah, French press is the way to go. They're pretty great systems if you like the oil. I do, so I don't even use the paper filter.
Mind if I ask what you don't like about French Press coffee? I ask only because we've been FP-only when at home for more than 10 years now. I can enjoy a cup of coffee from just about anywhere when on the road, so I'm definitely not a picky drinker but I do enjoy homemade FP the most.
I find it opposite end of spectrum from pour over. Don't you agree it's a different taste? I think it's just personal preference. It's far more oily and often has sediment / fines in the cup. You ever have any cholesterol issues? I've also heard the cafestol is something to look out for with FP (but again, I'm only interested in trying paper filtered FP which should clean a lot of that up).
Jeez, thanks for that invitation down the rabbit hole lol. Prior to your comment, I'd never come across any studies on boiled vs filtered coffee and its effects on hypertension and overall cardiovascular health. I've since read several and I'm now questioning my life choices. Seriously though, thanks for tip, and I'll definitely be doing my own experiments soon.
Maybe try the caffi filters? Unless there is a lot of leakage or they are overly porous, they should filter out cafestol (no data available unfortunately) and people seem to love them especially because they make cleanup easier. I'm interested in them primarily in hopes they crisp up the taste of FP. I've ordered some and can report back. If you remember, a few months from now would be curious if you made a dent in cholesterol with coffee related changes.
I use an insulated FP because the glass ones would break after a year or so of just standard use. The insulated metal one I've had is going on 13 years now. I have only recently had to replace the plunger, as it wore out and was allowing grinds to pass on the side.
How do you know when to stop plunging with the insulated one? I thought you are supposed to stop just before you hit the grounds. Also, why not do just metal instead of insulated? With most insulated do to double wall they don't recommend dishwasher. With a metal one that's not insulated you could throw it in the dishwasher.
Stop plunging? When it bottoms out, everything I've read says when it bottoms out. The insulated one was on sale, and I can't remember ever seeing a regular metal french press. I have thrown mine in the dishwasher. I usually just rinse it, or quick hand wash it, but I've tossed it in the dishwasher plenty.
I also am a mainly pour over person but incorporate other methods (French Press, AeroPress, Syphon, etc.) depending on how I’m feeling and the beans I’m brewing. Check out Hoffman’s French Press video. I used to not enjoy most FP because I would either way over extract or make it too weak. His approach has minimal agitation, maximizes immersion by letting it sit as long as possible after removing the bitter floating grounds, and reduces the grinds in the final brew by not plunging all the way and decanting slowly. As an addition, you could just decant through one of your pour over filters if you still don’t enjoy the mouth feel.
I'll echo someone else's suggestion of trying out James Hoffman's French press method. I get pretty clean cups while still retaining that oily goodness.
The main thing that affects taste with FP that I have found is brewing time.
I find myself experimenting with brew time, for each and every different bag of beans or grounds to achieve optimal taste.
Starting with standard 4 minute brewing time: If that brew is underextracted, add 1 minute the next time; Likewise, if that brew is overextracted, subtract 1 minute the next time.
I can dial in the optimal brew time for taste for a new bag within 2-3 days.
Medium roasts tend to be overextracted at 4 minutes, dark roasts can go 4 minutes or more.
I have a hot water pot that maintains water temperature at 195F, and I don't like futzing with it.
I don't use paper filters, just a fine mesh filter.
Interesting, I've heard of extending beyond four but never shortening it, especially with water that cool. Most sources seem to push temp beyond the pour over range to just shy of boiling for FP. Four pour over usually go slightly higher in temp for lighter roasts so would have thought maybe longer extraction on those.
On a graph of time vs extraction, I'm sure there's a logarithmic curve for any given temperature, with optimal extraction for taste falling some time value well before maximum extraction before the bitter astringent compounds are added to the brew.
I've never tried a light roast in any brewing method, but I suspect it would be even more finicky to get right than medium roast.
"Most sources" consensus is a good starting point, but it's really up to 1) What resources and equipment you have, 2) how much effort you're willing to put in, and 3) your personal taste.
the only reason I use an insulated one is because it's more robust, and the guarantees I won't burn myself on the outside like an idiot. you really do not want to leave your coffee on top of those grounds for very long
How in the world is this epreso travel mug FP getting such good reviews?
I've seen gibberish that the over extraction doesn't happen in these giant insulated FP systems because there is no agitation, but there would be a ton of agitation in a bloody travel mug. Even in a counter top insulated 32 or 34 oz insulated FP every time you pour off a cup it would be agitating. I'm perplexed.
I have one of those. Well, a variation of one of those. I think mine is from Stanley. It's really awesome as a camping system since I don't have to worry about breaking it, and I don't need to keep track of different parts and filters. But I pour it into a mug immediately after the designated brew time. I would never dream of leaving it in there. Bleck!
Yeah that makes sense to me, but they advertise this thing like you just sip on it on the go while the grounds are hanging out in there. Asked someone else this too, but in a non transparent FP how do you even know when to stop plunging? You have to wait until you feel resistance on grounds? I thought putting direct plunger pressure on the grounds was a bad idea.
Yeah, I just press until I can put the lid on. I'm camping, so anything better than instant coffee tastes amazing. Haha.