I'm going to have to bust out the Adderall and actually read the article? /s
Good stuff. Too bad we have a huge portion of the country who thinks that is Communism and against God.
this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
26 points (86.1% liked)
Housing Crisis
164 readers
1 users here now
A place to post news and have discussions about the housing crisis, its effect on people who are priced out, and what the future has in store.
Post news, share opinions and discuss potential solutions. Change begins with every new person.
Rules:
- No spam, no fake ass quasi-news, and no low-tier memes.
- No bigotry or hate speech or other illegal posting shit.
- No derailing valuable conversations using deviant tactics.
Other resources:
https://lemmy.world/c/rebubble
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Unfortunately, that mandatory (??) pull from the article -every- post seems to get ... gave away the suspense ... so I figured that'd do ya ;->
Article notes how much taxpayer money was saved. Where I live they spend millions a year paying cops to take apart the encampments. Cheaper than Helsinki, where giving the homeless a home is mandatory ... and is pretty much wiping out homelessness. Oh, and as I recall, that kind of 'communism' was a big part of Christ's message they've conventiently forgotten.
I’m confused at how they spent 2.1 million dollars or close to a quarter of what they raised on fundraising and delivery. If there were aid workers working with people that would make sense but there were just 3 surveys over the course of the year and if you didn’t fill it out you still got paid. This seems like a relatively minimal amount of work: establish direct deposits, create a survey, and analyze a bit of data when you’re done
Also maybe I’m misinterpreting but the graphs seem to show the control group having much more similar outcomes to those getting larger sums and payments having much less of an effect than I’d expect
Also maybe I’m misinterpreting but the graphs seem to show the control group having much more similar outcomes to those getting larger sums and payments having much less of an effect than I’d expect
It does seem like the amount had very little correlation with the outcome.
I'd like to see a comparison with a zero-dollar control group. This study seems to assume that the numbers at the beginning wouldn't have improved without financial intervention.