this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
27 points (96.6% liked)

Aussie Enviro

880 readers
14 users here now

An Australian community for everything from your backyard to beyond the black stump.

Topics may include Aussie plants and animals, environmental, farming, energy, and climate news and stories (mostly Aus specific), etc. New related communities will be split off when required, think like subcommunities that exist on that other platform.

Trigger Warning: Community contains mostly bad environmental news (not by choice!). Community may also feature stories about animal agriculture and/or meat. Until tagging is available, please be aware and click accordingly.

Banner Credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/takver/14871864504/

Aussie Zone Rules

Server Info

/c/Aussie Environment acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the land, sea and waters, of the area that we live and work on across Australia. We acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture and pay our respects to their Elders past and present.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Nuclear isn't bad. I hate articles like this. We need more renewable energy to bolster our grids, but nuclear energy isn't the problem. It's fossil fuels primarily.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nuclear is bad. All existing nuclear plants should remain in service until they age out, but no new nuclear should be built. Nuclear power is very expensive, creates nearly eternal waste disposal problems, and poses huge security risks.

Some people have been misled into thinking nuclear energy is cheap, because they're only told about the direct cost of generating each watt. But the *actual* cost per watt after you include all costs involved is actually very EXPENSIVE for nuclear. This is called the "Levelized Cost Of Energy" (LCOE).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levelized_cost_of_electricity

And OP's article has a quote from the study commission that says it directly.

Quote: "In fact, [nuclear] is one of the most expensive ways to generate electricity according to GenCost [and] the time it would take to design and build nuclear generation would be too slow to replace retiring coal fired generation."