What's going on Canada?
🍁 Meta
🗺️ Provinces / Territories
🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
🏒 Sports
Hockey
Football (NFL)
unknownFootball (CFL)
unknownBaseball
unknownBasketball
unknownSoccer
unknown💻 Universities
💵 Finance / Shopping
🗣️ Politics
🍁 Social and Culture
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:
I swear, how did we get to this point, where we have massive (effectively) monopolies that are able to continue to merge and buy up smaller companies and grow?
I know we have anti-trust laws, but if companies are able to keep doing this, we need a review of those laws.
Because that's how capitalism works without strong enough regulations. You need to grow every year, and at a certain point you can't really do that without expanding into a new market or buying a competitor.
In exaggerated capitalism, one company grows until it owns everything. Its goal is to extract as much as possible from the population.
Never one company.
Usually three companies will end up owning an imdustry. It's far easier to manage a collusive oligopoly than a pure monopoly; and the governments are more likely to leave you alone.
No such thing as strong enough regulations. They'll alway find a way as long as there is motivation to do so.
Because that's how capitalism works. The goal is to make as much money as possible as fast as possible, which is harder to do when you have competition.
The myth of the "free market" is a way to distract people from the reality of a capital based system. The haves all want to be have-mores, and they will take from the needs to accomplish it.
Free market might work if politicians couldnoy accept any "donations" to adjust laws in favour of giant corps.
Nope. All you'd be doing is slowing down the damage in the short term while breeding more clever and less moral actors. The only way to get rid of that behaviour is to change the rules of the game.
The only way to get rid of that behaviour is to change the rules of the game.
All of this. Never, ever play someone else's game by their rules. Either change the game or change the rules. It's the only way to beat them.
It's getting really cyberpunk all in here lol
I doubt the laws were ever even intended to prevent this.
That is so immoral
My friend was desperate for work and found a job with a veterinarian. The job was a vet tech but the work was euthanizing dogs and puppies for the county. He quit after a few months and has never been the same.
Now imagine it's a big, faceless Corp that wants the government contracts for humane services. A worker will be forced to agree with how the company does business while the corporate bean counters look for ways to save money on euthanasia. Gas chambers will be manned by broken wage slaves who are only employed because they are detached from their emotions.
This happened in the US. The quality dropped, the prices skyrocketed, and the staff stopped caring. They hid fees in prescriptions- $17 for 30 pills and $15 for 4 more because there's a $12 dispensing fee hidden in every prescription. It took them a year to finally explain it to me. They fired me as a client (after 20+ years) when I questioned them. Find an independent clinic and support them!
Except in a lot of places there's no option to switch to an independent clinic. In my area, you're lucky to even have a vet in the first place. With the exception of one clinic that only deals with cats and another clinic with a questionable vet, all other clinics in my city are owned by the same company!
Can confirm that maintaining vet and support staff in vet hospitals is a serious challenge; horrifically driven by suicide as anything else.
Unfortunately the corps have seen how it's completely unregulated for price and, like dentists were, open to arbitrary prices bounded only by what people can afford for essential service.
It was only natural they'd snap up all the vets toward price fixing.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
He's lucky he could take it over because, for more than a decade, large and often international companies have been snapping up local clinics here and around the world, a trend that intensified in Canada a few years before the pandemic.
In the Halifax area, for example, where Redgrave practises, CBC News checked out the 55 local clinics, finding 23 of them (42 per cent) are corporate-owned.
An Angus Reid survey found 60 per cent of consumers who took their pet to the vet for a routine checkup in 2022 said they felt they were charged too much.
In a Calgary dog park, Laurie Peterson told CBC News she's on a budget but does her best "to pick independent" and has a vet she feels is affordable.
"I don't believe consolidation is making pet care more expensive," he said, pointing to inflation, rising rents and higher salaries as clinics compete for vets and staff as key issues.
In a statement, the VetStrategy chain said all its veterinarians and technicians have "clinical freedom to recommend and provide care that is best suited to both an animal's medical needs and an owner's financial position."
The original article contains 961 words, the summary contains 183 words. Saved 81%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Again, the Commons podcast did an episode on this. Highly recommend listening to the entire season on monopolies.
This actually just affected me this weekend. I was out of town about 12 hours from home. My son was watching new dog that I've had for a month. She was puppy mill breeder so didn't have good medical care. Anyways she had a bought of hemmoraghic gastroenteritis and I told my son to take her to the ER (regular vet was closed). The one I had gone to for about 30 years was no longer on google (my last dog died in 2019). There happened to be a new one not to far. I wanted to make it easy on my son so I told him to go there. It was a chain (Blue Pearl) that had bought out the previous emergency vet that I used to go to. Their facility was very nice but it cost $2600 to have her there for 24 hours. None of the of fees were super expensive but they added up.
If they are corporate, that means they have an office somewhere with a lot of people to pay. Bigger overhead means they need greater income to meet their gross profit targets.