this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
39 points (97.6% liked)

Anti-Corporate Movement

341 readers
16 users here now

This community is the first one on lemmy of its kind. It sits between the idea of anarchism/anti-capitalism and left leaning economic policy.

Our goal is to make people aware of the dangers of corporate control, its influence on governments and people as well as the small but steady abrasion of empathy around the world indirectly caused by it.

Current topics this includes but is not limited to:

Feel free to debate this but beware, corporate rhetoric is not welcome here. If you have arguments, bring them on. If its rhetoric trying to defend the evil actions of corporations, we will know and you will go.

Our declared goal so far is to have all companies and individuals worldwide capped at 999 mil USD in all assets, including ownership of other companies, sister companies and marital assets. The reason for this is that companies (and individuals) are not supposed to resemble small(?) countries with a single leader(-board) and shareholder primacy. Thats why we feel like they must be kept in check indefinitely.

But companies will just wander off The argument that large companies will just wander off is valid, which we embrace. We dont need microsoft, apple, google, amazon and other trillion dollar companies. There are small competitors being kept small and driven into brankruptcy by anti competitive behavior of these giants or simply bought up and closed. If starbucks left tomorrow, we would not have an issue with this.

But then we have x little microsofts that all belong to the same person(s) If in fact nobody was allowed to accumulate more than 999 mil in assets, they would not be able to own all these. And like defending agains burglary, it is not about complete defence but time and effort. You only have to keep the thief occupied long enough for them to be caught, give up or make a mistake.

But these giants have tons of IP which would then limit our growth Thats another topic we must touch on. We will (only this one time) take a page out of russias playbook and demand that IP of non complying companies (assets over 999 mil USD) will be declared invalid, which opens them up to be copied.

But then they will "live" in one country that doesnt accept this Correct, and they should be taken into custody the moment they enter the airspace of a country that supports this act.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/15741608

Slack is now using all content, including DMs, to train LLMs

They offer a thing they're calling an "opt-out."

The opt-out (a) is only available to companies who are slack customers, not end users, and (b) doesn't actually opt-out.

When a company account holder tries to opt-out, Slack says their data will still be used to train LLMs, but the results won't be shared with other companies.

LOL no. That's not an opt-out. The way to opt-out is to stop using Slack.

https://slack.com/intl/en-gb/trust/data-management/privacy-principles

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is for the best. The future can only be improved by more A.I. being trained on my unique words of wisdom.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Haha. I agree. In your particular case this is great.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yo, just a messenger app but ... Why do they need to train LLM anyway

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The answer is money. The AI craze lets every person not familiar with LLMs think that its some holy grail.

Also the fact that they have exclusive access to their customers chat data.

That why nobody can have exclusive access to our data except they pay us for it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

God I hope the AI bubble pops soon. I'm so fucking sick of it.