this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
290 points (98.0% liked)

Privacy

30856 readers
659 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I miss the days of VHS and DVD shelfs in homes, for example. If you bought the tapes and had them in your home, no corporate entity could alter those tapes without your consent, monitor how many times you watch them, sell your data to whomever they please without your knowledge, roll out new mandatory conditions to a 'user agreement,' or remove them from your library if/when they like.

I noticed some dumb change in how Dictionary definitions are shown in the Spotlight (ie, overall search my computer function) in MacOS this week. I've turned off all auto-updates, and I didn't make that change or consent to it. But despite paying the full price all by myself for this machine, I clearly don't have 100% control over it. It seems very clearly to me that consumers having control and privacy over their Internet-connected devices is a bygone era.

After Blizzard, the video game company, replaced copies of Warcraft 3 that I and others had paid for in full and installed on our computers that we could play without connecting to the Internet with a lower-quality copy that prohibited offline play - I swore I'd never pay for a video game again*, and 3 years later I haven't backslid on that. I felt so angry, cheated, and robbed by that. (*Edit: my criticism and frustration is really more with larger developers/companies/creators - I appreciate and am happy to support smaller, more independent and libre ones.)

Many people probably won't be bothered by these things, but I am. I don't want to pay full price for something that I don't truly own. I miss the familiarity. I miss the reliability. I miss feeling like it's mine. Dependable. Trustworthy.

Picking my old guitar up again has never looked so appealing. I think I want to go back to investing more time, money, and energy into things that aren't connected to the internet

(page 2) 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I swore I’d never pay for a video game again

The libre software too?

go back to investing more time, money, and energy into things that aren’t connected to the internet

They'll obviously win when we run away. We should take the fight to them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I might've misspoke about never paying for a video game again. I do like the look of gog. I'm really out of the loop when it comes to gaming. I like more privacy- and ownership-respecting platforms, and I would (do) pay for those. What I meant was I'd caught a glimpse of the direction of the mainstream gaming industry with WC3, and I realized it wouldn't work for me and had to get off it. I use LibreOffice. I'll check out the libre gaming software, thanks!

They’ll obviously win when we run away. We should take the fight to them.

I appreciate your point of view. The way I see it, I think maybe 95/100 people blindly trust big tech companies and 5 of us don't (to the willing we'll avoid mainstream social media, for example); the proportion is debatable, but I think it's a very uneven divide. I don't think we have enough power to "stick it" to big tech. I also don't think we need to. I participated in the reddit blackout last summer and then I left it altogether for here (Lemmy), which I enjoy more and want to help grow more than I did the last place. I guess I do want some people to keep big tech in check and whistle-blow, at least to help spread awareness. I guess I'm just not the person for the job, and I think that's okay. More tech savvy people would do well in those roles :)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Target Discord first. Games are non-essentials. Discord is a tool, beyond any one game, used beyond gaming. Don't destroy your influence, don't leave the conversation, don't leave Steam just yet but use it strategically (and GOG Galaxy isn't even for Linux).

Tech savvy people aren't going to come and join our friends and join our family. For libre software by default, we must act.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You don't need to use GOG Galaxy since you can download the offline installers for any game (including, for some, the Linux version).

Been buying from GOG for years now and never used GOG Galaxy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It exposes their priorities.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

If their priorities were to track customers, incentivise game integration with their store (i.e. gamemaker lock-in) and the possibility of taking games away from customers, all like Steam does, they would not maintain that glaring backdoor for all those priorities that is letting customers download full installers that they can keep and which do not check back with the store on install.

I'm sure that they would like the advantage of tying people (both gamers and gamemakers) to their store, yet clearly they're not forcing that as Steam does, so what they're prioritizing (in other words, their priority) is clearly not that.

Given that their unique selling proposition is "no DRM" or more broadly "customer freedom to use the games they bought", it makes sense that that is GOG's overriding priority, even if they would also like all the (for a store) nice side-effects of built-in DRM and phone-home installers like Steam's.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

GOG spreads anti-libre software, like Steam, but do they contribute to libre operating system software?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Just looked up some of the latest Movies. You can still get DVDs of that's what you want. Even in a store with cash.

Is that what you want?

How are you leaning guitar? YouTube, apps, enshitification sites full of ads? Or buying a book?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Thanks for the info! I general sail the seven seas for that suff but thought it was a pretty good example of the larger trend.

I played guitar for 5+ years, never really learning properly, but being able to jam okay. I can't do that any more, but I have a pretty good knowledge base to start from. It's probably a matter of I should just do whatever's fun until I'm picking up the guitar a few times a week regularly - then I can get more focused. For easy-starting fun, that's probably strumming and singing through songs on a less ad and malware-bloated website. To get serious, I'd like to work with a metronome, maybe finally feel confident with a 12-bar blues, transcribe some solos perhaps. Very old school 😎. Do you play or want to learn?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I have shelves of dvds but I am getting rid of them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because you have a server where you stored the movies on?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

nope. in most cases streaming works well enough but we do have many on a hard drive from the included itunes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

But why would you get rid of your actually owned stuff? Streaming is low quality bullshit. Back your physical media onto a NAS and you can stream or access your good stuff from there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

well as I said we do have some on hard drive but streaming is more convenient and by and large been fine.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›