this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
101 points (93.9% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3286 readers
155 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 53 points 3 months ago

Would be interesting to see 1800 controlled for child mortality.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is less interesting than standard deviation, percentage living to 50/60/70/80, or life expectancy for men/women and at 1/5/18 years old though, as the issue here is it's hard to tell what is from things like dying in childbirth for both the child & mother and dying as a young child, vs being able to live longer, as we know people have lived well into their 80s and 90s since records began (ie Ancient Greece/Egypt/Sumeria) but this data implies that everyone used to die at 30, when in reality there were likely 2 peaks at 0-5 and 60-80

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

this data implies that everyone used to die at 30

No, it doesn't. Unless you don't know what life expectancy means.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Life expectancy is how long you can expect to live from birth. It being 30 implies that you can expect to live 30 years, however in fact you'd most likely live <5 or >50 years

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

How is Australia doing so good? Half the things there are trying to kill you!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

How is the US doing so good? Half the population there is trying to shoot you!

How is the UK doing so good? Half the cooks there are trying to poison you!

/j

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

The change from 1800 to 1950 is mostly caused by soap, and the change from 1950 to 2015 by penicilline and the Haber process.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Not even. The biggest change is due to crazy high infant mortality rates no longer drastically reducing the average

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yes, and what caused the reduction in infant mortality?

Soap. Or rather the revolutionary idea that it would be good if doctors and midwives used it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Which was largely due to the introduction of soap and hygiene practices during childbirth.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Do not forget vaccines.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Why is Canada doing better than the US?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago

Single-payer healthcare not tied to employment?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

In 2015, single payer healthcare

Today, infant and maternal mortality

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago
  1. Monaco 90 years
  2. Loma Linda 88 years