this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
643 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

11261 readers
2946 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 99 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 45 points 6 months ago

I’m pretty sure everyone is allergic to having their skin and lungs rubbed with mica.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Moon dust is functionally a lot like asbestos. It is composed of a sizeable amount of tiny shards of rock that aren't great for your lungs.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yea, you should really consider that before breathing on the moon

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Any lunar dust that they made contact with would have found its way into the lunar module for them to breathe in and be exposed to.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Isn't moon dust just sand?

[–] [email protected] 86 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's sand that has never been exposed to water or oxygen. This leaves various reactive chemicals on the surface that would normally be broken down. The lack of water also means the particles haven't been smoothed off as much. They are sharp and spiky.

The combination of these effects makes the dust quite unique, compared to earth dust.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It also reportedly smells like gunpowder.

[–] prayer 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Burned or unburned? They are two distinct smells.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Burned, according to the astronauts. I don’t know if the exact mechanism has been published anywhere, but since spent gunpowder has been oxidized I imagine that’s what’s going on with the dust as well.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago (2 children)

50% SiO2, 15% Al2O3, 10% CaO, 10% MgO, 5% TiO2 and 5-15% iron

[–] [email protected] 46 points 6 months ago

And 100% reason to remember the name.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

All those oxides but the iron is pure? SUS.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Jack Schmidt = Anakin confirmed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

More like Jack Schmidt = Cave Johnson

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

The sample size is at least a little bit bigger...

Some guy stole moon rocks (presumably still had moon dust on them) to bang his gf on them.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Roberts was sentenced to more than eight years in prison for his role in the Moonrock caper, as well as a separate offence of stealing dinosaur bones from a museum in Utah.

I'm afraid to ask what he did with the dinosaur bones!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Boned on bones, obviously.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

Thank you so much

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago

So, if someone were to crash the moon into the earth to stop it escaping, as many as 1/12 of the population could experience a reduced quality of life?

Might need to consider not doing that I suppose.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

Not being allergic to finely graded rocks that have been bathing in radiation for billions of years seems more unlikely.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

what'd be the smallest sample size that would yield a relevant result?

30? 1000?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Can we not... Just... Bring back some moon dust?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

There's the possibility of contamination if we do that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago