Progressive Politics

842 readers

138 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

How can we reform the Law of War to allow heads of state and government buildings to be targeted? (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It doesn’t make any sense to me that leaders of countries can declare war with total immunity from its violence, unless they’re actually fighting themselves, which in most cases they are not.

They have nothing to lose when they declare war, so why should they be allowed to put all of us at risk?

How can the Laws of War be changed to hold politicians accountable for their actions and make them think long and hard before engaging in wars? Maybe alternatively, all politicians including the president/PM/leader should have to serve in the military as well.

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I guess the logic behind those rules is to maximise the chance for negotiations to be successful. If both countries are in chaos because their leaders keep getting killed, who are you going to negotiate a cease fire with?

Of course, this is assuming all other rules (only targeting military infrastructure, minimising civilian casualties, etc) are followed, which pretty much never happens.

I do agree with your point that the elites are way too isolated from the consequences of war, which makes them way too hawkish for their own good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah that makes sense, but there are multiple people who can negotiate a ceasefire.

In times of war there should be a second and maybe third in command who must stay separate from first in command and each other. They are immune from being killed by laws of war. First in command is always fair game.